The State of Biological Research in Forest Canopies: Colombia as a Case Study for Megadiverse Tropical Countries

ABSTRACT Forests are a critical interface between Earth's terrestrial biomass and the atmosphere that play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Despite their importance, the study of forest canopies has been hindered by accessibility challenges. Because canopy biodiversity and ecology are inadequately sampled from the ground, the historic dependence on ground‐based data limits our understanding of forest biology at local and regional scales, which in turn can obstruct or challenge the setting of conservation priorities. This is particularly true for tropical countries with the highest levels of forest biodiversity and degradation. We evaluate the published research outputs from canopy research in Colombia, a megadiverse tropical country that faces escalating deforestation rates, which may serve as a model for tropical countries with high levels of biodiversity and mounting conservation challenges. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning 1974–2022, we assessed the taxonomic groups, research objectives, methodological approaches, and geographical distribution of canopy research. Our findings reveal that canopy research in Colombia is skewed in its taxonomic focus towards vascular plants and its geographic coverage is greatest in the Andes. Moreover, most studies treated the canopy as a covariate rather than the primary research objective, thereby limiting possible inferences into canopy biodiversity. Our results offer a call to action to increase the number of canopy studies in Colombia, emphasising the need for increased geographic representation, capacity‐building, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the involvement of non‐academic stakeholders. As the Global South faces critical conservation challenges, understanding canopy biodiversity and processes will be essential for informed conservation and sustainable forest management strategies in biologically diverse nations. We conclude by proposing four lessons from Colombia to advance canopy research in megadiverse tropical countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Austral Ecology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.70075
Primary Topic
Plant and soil sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The State of Biological Research in Forest Canopies: Colombia as a Case Study for Megadiverse Tropical Countries

Sandra Patrícia Osorio Galeano, Nicolás Reyes‐Amaya, Nathalia Moreno‐Niño, Julián Clavijo‐Bustos et al.
Austral Ecology
Plant and soil sciences
article

The State of Biological Research in Forest Canopies: Colombia as a Case Study for Megadiverse Tropical Countries

Sandra Patrícia Osorio Galeano, Nicolás Reyes‐Amaya, Nathalia Moreno‐Niño, Julián Clavijo‐Bustos, David L. Anderson, Luis Felipe Barrera, Daniela García‐Cobos, Johann Stephens Cárdenas‐Bautista, Eliana Barona‐Cortés, Julián Lozano‐Flórez, Carolina Gómez‐Posada, Gustavo A. Bravo, Sandra M. Urbano-Apráez, Sebastián Cifuentes‐Acevedo, Aidee Guzman, Angela M. Mendoza‐Henao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Forests are a critical interface between Earth's terrestrial biomass and the atmosphere that play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Despite their importance, the study of forest canopies has been hindered by accessibility challenges. Because canopy biodiversity and ecology are inadequately sampled from the ground, the historic dependence on ground‐based data limits our understanding of forest biology at local and regional scales, which in turn can obstruct or challenge the setting of conservation priorities. This is particularly true for tropical countries with the highest levels of forest biodiversity and degradation. We evaluate the published research outputs from canopy research in Colombia, a megadiverse tropical country that faces escalating deforestation rates, which may serve as a model for tropical countries with high levels of biodiversity and mounting conservation challenges. Through a comprehensive literature review spanning 1974–2022, we assessed the taxonomic groups, research objectives, methodological approaches, and geographical distribution of canopy research. Our findings reveal that canopy research in Colombia is skewed in its taxonomic focus towards vascular plants and its geographic coverage is greatest in the Andes. Moreover, most studies treated the canopy as a covariate rather than the primary research objective, thereby limiting possible inferences into canopy biodiversity. Our results offer a call to action to increase the number of canopy studies in Colombia, emphasising the need for increased geographic representation, capacity‐building, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the involvement of non‐academic stakeholders. As the Global South faces critical conservation challenges, understanding canopy biodiversity and processes will be essential for informed conservation and sustainable forest management strategies in biologically diverse nations. We conclude by proposing four lessons from Colombia to advance canopy research in megadiverse tropical countries.

Austral EcologyVol. 50(5)
American Museum of Natural History (US), National University of Mar del Plata (AR), Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute (CO), World Water Watch (US), Institute of Marine and Coastal Research (AR), Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Plant and soil sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.