Effect of Graphene Oxide Quantities on Microhardness of Cured-Surface Coating Agents

This study aimed to investigate the impact of varying concentrations of graphene oxide (GO) combined with two surface coating agents (SCAs) and two dental adhesives (DAHs) used as SCAs on microhardness. Two SCAs, Resin Glaze (ReG) and Coat-It (CoI) (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan), along with two DAHs, Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Multi-purpose Adhesive (AdA) (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and OptiBond<sup>TM</sup> FL Adhesive (OpA) (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan), were tested. The ten concentrations of GO-0 wt % (control), 0.05 wt %, 0.1 wt %, 0.3 wt %, 0.5 wt %, 0.7 wt %, 1 wt %, 2 wt %, 5 wt %, and 10 wt %-were incorporated into the SCAs and DAHs to create the experimental formulations. These mixtures underwent centrifugation for homogenization, followed by sonication for dispersion. The mixture was poured into the 3D-printed resin mold (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height) and then cured with a light curing unit for 180 s. The cured specimens were then kept in distilled water at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h. All specimens were then subjected to evaluation of their microhardness properties using a Knoop hardness testing machine. Data were collected, and the statistical analysis was conducted using Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc tests at a 0.05 level of significance. According to the results, surface hardness was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when 0.3-0.7 wt % of GO was added to ReG, CoI, and AdA, compared to the control group. However, surface hardness was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when 0.05-0.3 wt % of GO was added to OpA compared to the control group. In the control groups, the microhardness of OpA was significantly higher than that of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the 0.1 wt % groups, the microhardness of OpA was significantly higher than that of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 0.5 wt %, ReG, CoI, and AdA showed significantly higher microhardness compared to their respective control groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the 1-10 wt % groups, the microhardness of ReG, CoI, and AdA demonstrated a gradual, significant decrease compared to the 0.7 wt % groups. Whereas in the 0.5-10 wt % groups, the microhardness of OpA showed a significant gradual decrease compared to the 0.3 wt % group. In summary, the optimal GO concentration could improve the surface hardness of ReG, CoI, AdA, and OpA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111472
Primary Topic
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Graphene Oxide Quantities on Microhardness of Cured-Surface Coating Agents

Tool Sriamporn, Somphob Thompho, Somporn Swasdison, Awiruth Klaisiri et al.
Polymers
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
article

Effect of Graphene Oxide Quantities on Microhardness of Cured-Surface Coating Agents

Tool Sriamporn, Somphob Thompho, Somporn Swasdison, Awiruth Klaisiri, Niyom Thamrongananskul, Khanaphan Lebkrut
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of varying concentrations of graphene oxide (GO) combined with two surface coating agents (SCAs) and two dental adhesives (DAHs) used as SCAs on microhardness. Two SCAs, Resin Glaze (ReG) and Coat-It (CoI) (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan), along with two DAHs, Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Multi-purpose Adhesive (AdA) (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and OptiBond<sup>TM</sup> FL Adhesive (OpA) (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan), were tested. The ten concentrations of GO-0 wt % (control), 0.05 wt %, 0.1 wt %, 0.3 wt %, 0.5 wt %, 0.7 wt %, 1 wt %, 2 wt %, 5 wt %, and 10 wt %-were incorporated into the SCAs and DAHs to create the experimental formulations. These mixtures underwent centrifugation for homogenization, followed by sonication for dispersion. The mixture was poured into the 3D-printed resin mold (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height) and then cured with a light curing unit for 180 s. The cured specimens were then kept in distilled water at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h. All specimens were then subjected to evaluation of their microhardness properties using a Knoop hardness testing machine. Data were collected, and the statistical analysis was conducted using Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc tests at a 0.05 level of significance. According to the results, surface hardness was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when 0.3-0.7 wt % of GO was added to ReG, CoI, and AdA, compared to the control group. However, surface hardness was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when 0.05-0.3 wt % of GO was added to OpA compared to the control group. In the control groups, the microhardness of OpA was significantly higher than that of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the 0.1 wt % groups, the microhardness of OpA was significantly higher than that of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 0.5 wt %, ReG, CoI, and AdA showed significantly higher microhardness compared to their respective control groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the 1-10 wt % groups, the microhardness of ReG, CoI, and AdA demonstrated a gradual, significant decrease compared to the 0.7 wt % groups. Whereas in the 0.5-10 wt % groups, the microhardness of OpA showed a significant gradual decrease compared to the 0.3 wt % group. In summary, the optimal GO concentration could improve the surface hardness of ReG, CoI, AdA, and OpA.

PolymersVol. 17(11)
Thammasat University (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Rangsit University (TH)
Chulalongkorn University
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.