Jürgen Habermas im Kontext von Biokonservativismus und Stammzellethik

Abstract The relationship between Jürgen Habermas’s position on bioethics and bioconservativism is still insufficiently clear. Although Habermas himself notes that he can, in an unspecified sense, be considered conservative with regard to bioethics, this self-designation does not itself constitute proof. The fact that Habermas’s arguments have been taken up in the bioconservative debate has led some to acknowledge Habermas’s engagement with bioconservatism. However, the clarification of the condition of individual freedom that Habermas proposes in his bioethics mediates the selfhood of the person through the materiality of a biological beginning. Thus, as will be shown, he repeatedly departs from the bioconservative discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2024-0059
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jürgen Habermas im Kontext von Biokonservativismus und Stammzellethik

Mathias Wirth
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Jürgen Habermas im Kontext von Biokonservativismus und Stammzellethik

Mathias Wirth
article en

Abstract

Abstract The relationship between Jürgen Habermas’s position on bioethics and bioconservativism is still insufficiently clear. Although Habermas himself notes that he can, in an unspecified sense, be considered conservative with regard to bioethics, this self-designation does not itself constitute proof. The fact that Habermas’s arguments have been taken up in the bioconservative debate has led some to acknowledge Habermas’s engagement with bioconservatism. However, the clarification of the condition of individual freedom that Habermas proposes in his bioethics mediates the selfhood of the person through the materiality of a biological beginning. Thus, as will be shown, he repeatedly departs from the bioconservative discourse.

Deutsche Zeitschrift für PhilosophieVol. 72(6)
University of Bern (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.