Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subcostal Approach: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has gained global popularity.Two recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated that RAMIE leads to shorter operative times and a greater number of dissected lymph nodes than conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).This study presents initial experience with single-port RAMIE (SRAMIE) performed via the subcostal approach using the single-port (SP) robotic system.The study aimed to assess the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of SRAMIE compared with multiport RAMIE (MRAMIE) using the Xi robotic system and video-assisted thoracic surgery esophagectomy (VAE).Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer at Korea University Guro Hospital between February 2017 and December 2024.Patients were divided into 3 groups: SRAMIE (n=17), MRA-MIE (n=13), and VAE (n=23).The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications.Secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, and 30-day mortality.Results: No conversions to thoracotomy or VAE occurred in the SRAMIE group.Compared with VAE, SRAMIE resulted in significantly shorter chest tube duration (p=0.038),shorter postoperative hospital stays (p=0.036), and lower peak postoperative pain (p=0.003).No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups regarding total operative time, the number of resected lymph nodes, or the incidence of postoperative complications.Conclusion: SRAMIE using the SP robotic system is a feasible approach offering advantages over VAE in recovery and postoperative pain.The noninferior perioperative outcomes indicate that SRAMIE may serve as a viable alternative to conventional MIE, warranting further large-scale studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chest Surgery
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.2025s1.25s-0057
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subcostal Approach: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Ho June Song, Byung Mo Gu, Hyun Koo Kim, Jun Hee Lee
1 links
Journal of Chest Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subcostal Approach: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Ho June Song, Byung Mo Gu, Hyun Koo Kim, Jun Hee Lee
article en

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has gained global popularity.Two recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated that RAMIE leads to shorter operative times and a greater number of dissected lymph nodes than conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).This study presents initial experience with single-port RAMIE (SRAMIE) performed via the subcostal approach using the single-port (SP) robotic system.The study aimed to assess the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of SRAMIE compared with multiport RAMIE (MRAMIE) using the Xi robotic system and video-assisted thoracic surgery esophagectomy (VAE).Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer at Korea University Guro Hospital between February 2017 and December 2024.Patients were divided into 3 groups: SRAMIE (n=17), MRA-MIE (n=13), and VAE (n=23).The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications.Secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, and 30-day mortality.Results: No conversions to thoracotomy or VAE occurred in the SRAMIE group.Compared with VAE, SRAMIE resulted in significantly shorter chest tube duration (p=0.038),shorter postoperative hospital stays (p=0.036), and lower peak postoperative pain (p=0.003).No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups regarding total operative time, the number of resected lymph nodes, or the incidence of postoperative complications.Conclusion: SRAMIE using the SP robotic system is a feasible approach offering advantages over VAE in recovery and postoperative pain.The noninferior perioperative outcomes indicate that SRAMIE may serve as a viable alternative to conventional MIE, warranting further large-scale studies.

Journal of Chest SurgeryVol. 58(Suppl 1)
Korea University Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.