Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Contaminant Concentration Distributions in Hospital Wards

As the distribution of indoor contaminants is often heterogeneous, the traditional Wells–Riley equation is inadequate for accurately assessing the infection risk to indoor personnel. In this study, contaminant concentration data from hospital wards were obtained through experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Four common machine learning models—multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), backpropagation (BP) neural network, and convolutional neural network (CNN)—were employed to predict the distribution of contaminants within the wards. The results demonstrate that the CNN achieves the best predictive performance, followed by the BP neural network. Specifically, the CNN exhibited a root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error of 6.31 ppm, 3.18 ppm, and 8.33%, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that the CNN reduced the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 58.18%, 33.47%, and 25.15% compared to MLR, SVR, and BPNN, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111828
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Contaminant Concentration Distributions in Hospital Wards

Yunfei Ding, Chonggang Zhou
1 citations
Buildings
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
1.88
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Contaminant Concentration Distributions in Hospital Wards

Yunfei Ding, Chonggang Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As the distribution of indoor contaminants is often heterogeneous, the traditional Wells–Riley equation is inadequate for accurately assessing the infection risk to indoor personnel. In this study, contaminant concentration data from hospital wards were obtained through experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Four common machine learning models—multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), backpropagation (BP) neural network, and convolutional neural network (CNN)—were employed to predict the distribution of contaminants within the wards. The results demonstrate that the CNN achieves the best predictive performance, followed by the BP neural network. Specifically, the CNN exhibited a root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error of 6.31 ppm, 3.18 ppm, and 8.33%, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that the CNN reduced the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 58.18%, 33.47%, and 25.15% compared to MLR, SVR, and BPNN, respectively.

BuildingsVol. 15(11)
Guangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.