Marx’ Antwort auf den Mythos des Gegebenen

Abstract I present a reading of Marx’s critique of what he terms ‘intuitional materialism’, an expression which suggests a close link to Kant’s account of intuition. On my account, Marx advocates a view of sensibility as active, whereas Kant’s account of sensibility has often been interpreted as passive. In so doing, I claim that Marx offers an implicit critique of the conventional distinction between the ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ faculties, including Wilfrid Sellars’ attack on the myth of the given. Marx claims that limiting the contribution of cognition to the abstraction of particulars into concepts is a symptom of alienation under capitalism, while unalienation consists in the aesthetic attunement of sensible activity to the particularity of experience. This view is importantly related, I claim, to the cue Marx and Engels took from Darwin in reconceiving biological science, including the study of human material life, as dynamic and organic rather than mechanical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2024-0061
Primary Topic
Economic and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marx’ Antwort auf den Mythos des Gegebenen

Sabina Vaccarino Bremner
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Economic and Social Issues
article

Marx’ Antwort auf den Mythos des Gegebenen

Sabina Vaccarino Bremner
article en

Abstract

Abstract I present a reading of Marx’s critique of what he terms ‘intuitional materialism’, an expression which suggests a close link to Kant’s account of intuition. On my account, Marx advocates a view of sensibility as active, whereas Kant’s account of sensibility has often been interpreted as passive. In so doing, I claim that Marx offers an implicit critique of the conventional distinction between the ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ faculties, including Wilfrid Sellars’ attack on the myth of the given. Marx claims that limiting the contribution of cognition to the abstraction of particulars into concepts is a symptom of alienation under capitalism, while unalienation consists in the aesthetic attunement of sensible activity to the particularity of experience. This view is importantly related, I claim, to the cue Marx and Engels took from Darwin in reconceiving biological science, including the study of human material life, as dynamic and organic rather than mechanical.

Deutsche Zeitschrift für PhilosophieVol. 72(6)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Economic and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.