Legal (Dis)Orders

This article critically examines India’s legislative framework on women’s reproductive labour, focusing on the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021. It explores how these laws, with their prohibitionist approach, demand altruism on the part of women and undermine their reproductive autonomy. Our analysis combines constitutional arguments on reproductive rights, privacy and bodily autonomy with empirical research to assess the law’s ramifications in a privatized labour market. The findings underscore the resilience of women involved in reproductive labour, who resist the unjust laws and assert their rights within a complex regulatory landscape. The research further reveals that the widening demand–supply gap as a result of the restrictive laws potentially fosters an underground economy where reproductive services are rendered with exploitative repercussions for the women, which demands urgent reworking of the law. Keywords: assisted reproductive technology (ART); reproductive labour; surrogacy; egg donation; reproductive justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amicus Curiae
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v6i2.5752
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal (Dis)Orders

Madhusree Jana, Prabha Kotiswaran
Amicus Curiae
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Legal (Dis)Orders

Madhusree Jana, Prabha Kotiswaran
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines India’s legislative framework on women’s reproductive labour, focusing on the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021. It explores how these laws, with their prohibitionist approach, demand altruism on the part of women and undermine their reproductive autonomy. Our analysis combines constitutional arguments on reproductive rights, privacy and bodily autonomy with empirical research to assess the law’s ramifications in a privatized labour market. The findings underscore the resilience of women involved in reproductive labour, who resist the unjust laws and assert their rights within a complex regulatory landscape. The research further reveals that the widening demand–supply gap as a result of the restrictive laws potentially fosters an underground economy where reproductive services are rendered with exploitative repercussions for the women, which demands urgent reworking of the law. Keywords: assisted reproductive technology (ART); reproductive labour; surrogacy; egg donation; reproductive justice.

Amicus CuriaeVol. 6(2)
King's College London (GB), King's College School (GB)
University of Minnesota, European Commission, Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.