Case Marking System in Khaling

This study examines the case-marking system in Khaling, a Rai-Kiranti language, and compares it with related languages such as Koyee, Sampang, Bantawa, Bayung, Dumi, Thulung, and Mewahang. Khaling follows an ergative-absolutive alignment, where the absolutive case remains unmarked, while the ergative and instrumental cases share the same marker (<-ʔɛ/-a>). The dative case is marked by <-bi>, while the genitive case takes <-po>. Other cases, including locative (<-bi>), Comitative (<-kolo>), ablative (<-lʌ/-kʌ/-lʌkʌ>), and allative (<-tʰʌ>), show both shared patterns and language-specific variations. The comparison reveals that while some Kiranti languages exhibit consistent case-marking strategies, others display phonetic and morphological divergence. Many languages use -bi/-pi for locative and -lʌ/-la for ablative, but differences in dative and allative markers suggest independent linguistic evolution. Some languages leave the dative unmarked, while others, like Bantawa and Dumi, use -lai. The findings highlight Khaling's historical connections with other Kiranti languages while showcasing distinct grammaticalization patterns. This study contributes to a broader understanding of case systems and linguistic evolution in the Kiranti languages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kirat Pragya किरात प्रज्ञा
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/kp.v4i1.79047
Primary Topic
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Marking System in Khaling

Arjun Rai
Kirat Pragya किरात प्रज्ञा
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
article

Case Marking System in Khaling

Arjun Rai
article en

Abstract

This study examines the case-marking system in Khaling, a Rai-Kiranti language, and compares it with related languages such as Koyee, Sampang, Bantawa, Bayung, Dumi, Thulung, and Mewahang. Khaling follows an ergative-absolutive alignment, where the absolutive case remains unmarked, while the ergative and instrumental cases share the same marker (<-ʔɛ/-a>). The dative case is marked by <-bi>, while the genitive case takes <-po>. Other cases, including locative (<-bi>), Comitative (<-kolo>), ablative (<-lʌ/-kʌ/-lʌkʌ>), and allative (<-tʰʌ>), show both shared patterns and language-specific variations. The comparison reveals that while some Kiranti languages exhibit consistent case-marking strategies, others display phonetic and morphological divergence. Many languages use -bi/-pi for locative and -lʌ/-la for ablative, but differences in dative and allative markers suggest independent linguistic evolution. Some languages leave the dative unmarked, while others, like Bantawa and Dumi, use -lai. The findings highlight Khaling's historical connections with other Kiranti languages while showcasing distinct grammaticalization patterns. This study contributes to a broader understanding of case systems and linguistic evolution in the Kiranti languages.

Kirat Pragya किरात प्रज्ञाVol. 4
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Case Marking System in Khaling — Arjun Rai · Kirat Pragya किरात प्रज्ञा (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS