Evaluating the environmental impact of cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch

Cleanup of existing plastic pollution is crucial to mitigate its impact on marine ecosystems, but such efforts must ensure benefits outweigh potential environmental damage caused by the cleanup. Here, we present an impact assessment framework and apply it to evaluate whether cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch (NPGP) benefits marine life and carbon cycling, using The Ocean Cleanup as a case study. Our findings indicate that marine life is more vulnerable to plastic pollution than to macroplastic cleanup, with average vulnerability scores (1 = low, 3 = high) of 2.3 for macroplastics, 1.9 for microplastics, and 1.8 for cleanup, suggesting a net positive impact. An 80% cleanup could reduce macroplastic concentrations to within reported safe levels for marine mammals and sea turtles. Estimated cleanup-related carbon emissions [0.4-2.9 million metric tons (Mt) in total] are significantly lower than potential long-term microplastics impacts on ocean carbon sequestration (15-30 Mt C per year). However, uncertainties remain regarding effects on air-sea carbon exchange. Our framework serves as a critical tool for assessing trade-offs between plastic pollution and remediation impacts. It demonstrates the environmental net benefits of the proposed NPGP cleanup and can be adapted to similarly evaluate other remediation plans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00619-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the environmental impact of cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch

Albert A. Koelmans, Vilma Havas, Karin Kvale, Maíra Proietti et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
2.52
article

Evaluating the environmental impact of cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch

Albert A. Koelmans, Vilma Havas, Karin Kvale, Maíra Proietti, Denise M. Mitrano, Camille Richon, Andy M. Booth, Thijs Bosker, Ziman Zhang, Laurent Lebreton, Peter S. Puskic, Gert Everaert, Yanxu Zhang, Matthew S. Savoca, Helge Niemann, Sarah‐Jeanne Royer, Samantha L. Garrard, Marjolein van Vulpen, Matthias Egger, Qiaotong Pang, Arjen Tjallema, Helga S. Huntley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Cleanup of existing plastic pollution is crucial to mitigate its impact on marine ecosystems, but such efforts must ensure benefits outweigh potential environmental damage caused by the cleanup. Here, we present an impact assessment framework and apply it to evaluate whether cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch (NPGP) benefits marine life and carbon cycling, using The Ocean Cleanup as a case study. Our findings indicate that marine life is more vulnerable to plastic pollution than to macroplastic cleanup, with average vulnerability scores (1 = low, 3 = high) of 2.3 for macroplastics, 1.9 for microplastics, and 1.8 for cleanup, suggesting a net positive impact. An 80% cleanup could reduce macroplastic concentrations to within reported safe levels for marine mammals and sea turtles. Estimated cleanup-related carbon emissions [0.4-2.9 million metric tons (Mt) in total] are significantly lower than potential long-term microplastics impacts on ocean carbon sequestration (15-30 Mt C per year). However, uncertainties remain regarding effects on air-sea carbon exchange. Our framework serves as a critical tool for assessing trade-offs between plastic pollution and remediation impacts. It demonstrates the environmental net benefits of the proposed NPGP cleanup and can be adapted to similarly evaluate other remediation plans.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Tulane University (US), GNS Science (NZ), Leiden University (NL), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR), Flanders Marine Institute (BE), University of Tasmania (AU), SINTEF (NO), Utrecht University (NL), Grid-Arendal (NO), Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), The Ocean Cleanup (NL), California Marine Sanctuary Foundation (US), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), Safety Management Systems Aotearoa (New Zealand) (NZ), Pacific University (US), Rowan University (US), Nanjing University (CN), Aalborg University (DK), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Norges Forskningsråd, Sorbonne Université, Earth Sciences Division, Division of Ocean Sciences
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.