Multi-objective Optimization of Biomedical Scaffold Geometries for Mechanical and Porous Performance Enhancement

Scaffold geometry plays a crucial role in determining its mechanical strength, as changes in shape can significantly impact its properties. Additionally, porosity, which varies with geometry, weakens the scaffold's mechanical performance. This study investigates the influence of scaffold geometry on mechanical properties and porosity in biomedical applications. Seven distinct geometries were designed using identical materials and fabricated through 3D printing. The scaffolds underwent compressive strength testing and finite element simulations to evaluate their load-bearing capacity and porosity. Among the designs, hexagonal and circular geometries demonstrated superior mechanical performance and controlled porosity. A total of 81 hexagonal and 27 circular scaffold samples were analyzed using Abaqus software. Initially, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model the relationship between pressure and porosity, identifying the optimal design space with high predictive accuracy (R² > 96%). Then, a multi-objective optimization process using the Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithm was implemented. The results revealed a Pareto front for each geometry, enabling the selection of scaffolds with specific load-bearing capacities and maximum porosity levels. Validation tests showed a mean error of 3.4% for circular geometries and 3.53% for hexagonal geometries, demonstrating the reliability of the simulation and optimization methods. This comprehensive approach integrates experimental, simulation, and optimization techniques, offering a robust framework for designing high-performance scaffolds tailored to biomedical needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2026.39.01a.14
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-objective Optimization of Biomedical Scaffold Geometries for Mechanical and Porous Performance Enhancement

Abolfazl Foorginejad, Khalil Khalili, Vahid Abdollahi, Hossein Afshari
International Journal of Engineering
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Multi-objective Optimization of Biomedical Scaffold Geometries for Mechanical and Porous Performance Enhancement

Abolfazl Foorginejad, Khalil Khalili, Vahid Abdollahi, Hossein Afshari
article en

Abstract

Scaffold geometry plays a crucial role in determining its mechanical strength, as changes in shape can significantly impact its properties. Additionally, porosity, which varies with geometry, weakens the scaffold's mechanical performance. This study investigates the influence of scaffold geometry on mechanical properties and porosity in biomedical applications. Seven distinct geometries were designed using identical materials and fabricated through 3D printing. The scaffolds underwent compressive strength testing and finite element simulations to evaluate their load-bearing capacity and porosity. Among the designs, hexagonal and circular geometries demonstrated superior mechanical performance and controlled porosity. A total of 81 hexagonal and 27 circular scaffold samples were analyzed using Abaqus software. Initially, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model the relationship between pressure and porosity, identifying the optimal design space with high predictive accuracy (R² > 96%). Then, a multi-objective optimization process using the Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithm was implemented. The results revealed a Pareto front for each geometry, enabling the selection of scaffolds with specific load-bearing capacities and maximum porosity levels. Validation tests showed a mean error of 3.4% for circular geometries and 3.53% for hexagonal geometries, demonstrating the reliability of the simulation and optimization methods. This comprehensive approach integrates experimental, simulation, and optimization techniques, offering a robust framework for designing high-performance scaffolds tailored to biomedical needs.

International Journal of EngineeringVol. 39(1)
University of Birjand (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.