Structural Model Validation: Evaluating the Goodness-of-Fits Indices of GUAM Framework

Models are fitted to data in an attempt to understand underlying processes that have been operating. To be useful, they should be parsimonious and clearly understood. For structural models, a huge variety of fit indices has been developed. These indices, however, can point to conclusions about the extent to which a model actually matches the observed data. The study evaluates the goodness-of-fit of a Generic Usability and Acceptance Model (GUAM). Measures for the study were adopted from the GUAM, and a questionnaire tagged Learning Innovations Adoption Questionnaire was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test and understand the underlying structure of the proposed model, using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). As regards model fit, the model went through a number of iterations until a good model was realised. Validity and reliability of the proposed generic model were also examined, both showing satisfactory validity and good internal consistency, which indicate that a good model fit has been attained. On this basis, GUAM model is considered a valid and reliable theoretical tool for learning innovations adoption and use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2025/v38i41396
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Model Validation: Evaluating the Goodness-of-Fits Indices of GUAM Framework

Frank Iwebuke Amadin, Anayochukwu Chukwunonso Obienu
1 links
Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Structural Model Validation: Evaluating the Goodness-of-Fits Indices of GUAM Framework

Frank Iwebuke Amadin, Anayochukwu Chukwunonso Obienu
article en

Abstract

Models are fitted to data in an attempt to understand underlying processes that have been operating. To be useful, they should be parsimonious and clearly understood. For structural models, a huge variety of fit indices has been developed. These indices, however, can point to conclusions about the extent to which a model actually matches the observed data. The study evaluates the goodness-of-fit of a Generic Usability and Acceptance Model (GUAM). Measures for the study were adopted from the GUAM, and a questionnaire tagged Learning Innovations Adoption Questionnaire was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test and understand the underlying structure of the proposed model, using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). As regards model fit, the model went through a number of iterations until a good model was realised. Validity and reliability of the proposed generic model were also examined, both showing satisfactory validity and good internal consistency, which indicate that a good model fit has been attained. On this basis, GUAM model is considered a valid and reliable theoretical tool for learning innovations adoption and use.

Journal of Education Society and Behavioural ScienceVol. 38(4)
University of Benin (NG)
Tertiary Education Trust Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structural Model Validation: Evaluating the Goodness-of-Fits Indices of GUAM Framework — Frank Iwebuke Amadin, Anayochukwu Chukwunonso Obienu · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS