The role of the interest in technology use in blurring the lines between accountability for sustainability performance and for financial performance

Purpose Technology may assist in improving accountability for sustainability performance, but not always. In order to increase understanding of this issue, this paper aims to look at the combined socially constructed effects of an interest in technology use on both accountability for sustainability performance and accountability for financial performance, which have often been seen as opposites. Design/methodology/approach The authors study a case company in the construction industry. Interviews and archival data from both company employees and stakeholders have been used in this in-depth social constructionist study. Findings An interest in technology use was socially constructed here to result in the blurring of the lines between accountability for sustainability performance and accountability for financial performance. The measure of the energy efficiency of technologies was not always constructed to measure sustainability performance from a stakeholder point of view but to result in a one-eyed focus on costs and in an enthusiasm for building novel buildings. On the other hand, cost savings due to technology use or sometimes due to the avoidance of this use, representing the financial performance, were surprisingly constructed as a potential sustainability-oriented measure. Stakeholders also constructed other measures, such as a measure for building conservation, as encouraging sustainability. Social implications Accountability, measurement and reporting were restricted by the means specified, here technology. Moreover, blurring of the lines between different accountabilities may complicate the assessment of accountability discharge. Originality/value Earlier research has warned against failures in technology implementations, while the authors show how apparently well-functioning technologies may also present problems for accountability performance from the stakeholder point of view in terms of accounting measurement and reporting. Here the energy efficiency measure in particular emerged as relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-08-2023-0143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of the interest in technology use in blurring the lines between accountability for sustainability performance and for financial performance

Terhi Chakhovich, Tuija Virtanen
1 citations
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
article

The role of the interest in technology use in blurring the lines between accountability for sustainability performance and for financial performance

Terhi Chakhovich, Tuija Virtanen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Technology may assist in improving accountability for sustainability performance, but not always. In order to increase understanding of this issue, this paper aims to look at the combined socially constructed effects of an interest in technology use on both accountability for sustainability performance and accountability for financial performance, which have often been seen as opposites. Design/methodology/approach The authors study a case company in the construction industry. Interviews and archival data from both company employees and stakeholders have been used in this in-depth social constructionist study. Findings An interest in technology use was socially constructed here to result in the blurring of the lines between accountability for sustainability performance and accountability for financial performance. The measure of the energy efficiency of technologies was not always constructed to measure sustainability performance from a stakeholder point of view but to result in a one-eyed focus on costs and in an enthusiasm for building novel buildings. On the other hand, cost savings due to technology use or sometimes due to the avoidance of this use, representing the financial performance, were surprisingly constructed as a potential sustainability-oriented measure. Stakeholders also constructed other measures, such as a measure for building conservation, as encouraging sustainability. Social implications Accountability, measurement and reporting were restricted by the means specified, here technology. Moreover, blurring of the lines between different accountabilities may complicate the assessment of accountability discharge. Originality/value Earlier research has warned against failures in technology implementations, while the authors show how apparently well-functioning technologies may also present problems for accountability performance from the stakeholder point of view in terms of accounting measurement and reporting. Here the energy efficiency measure in particular emerged as relevant.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational ChangeVol. 21(7)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finland University (FI), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.