Unmasking organizational factors contributing to bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces: insights from the Australian public sector

Purpose This study investigates the organizational factors associated with bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces, addressing a significant gap in empirical research. The aim is to identify systemic organizational issues that contribute to workplace bullying and offer insights to foster a safer and more respectful work culture within the public sector. By emphasizing organizational influences, this study adopts an institutional perspective, exploring how changes, particularly in the context of new public management (NPM) reforms, create conditions for workplace bullying. Design/methodology/approach The research involved in-depth qualitative interviews with 21 senior-level managers from the Victorian public sector (VPS) in Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data, enabling the identification of key organizational features linked to bullying behaviors. Findings The study identifies several interconnected organizational factors that perpetuate workplace bullying in the public sector. These include a permissive culture that tolerates such behaviors, a lack of consequences for perpetrators and noncompliance with anti-bullying protocols. Additionally, bullying is sometimes strategically used as a workforce downsizing tool, reflecting deeper systemic issues. The absence of accountability mechanisms further exacerbates the problem, creating an environment where bullying behaviors can thrive. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive organizational reforms to address the root causes of workplace bullying. Originality/value By shifting focus from individual traits to systemic organizational factors, this study offers a transformative lens for understanding and combating workplace bullying in the public sector. These insights provide actionable strategies for policymakers and managers aiming to foster respectful and accountable public workplaces. Highlights (1) The transition from traditional rule-based public sector characteristics to market-oriented, performance-driven cultures has introduced aggressive managerial behaviors, creating a conducive environment for bullying. (2) Network-based hiring and the formation of dominant subgroups by executives exacerbate bullying behaviors. (3) Cost-saving measures like transferring victims or perpetrators creates a culture of bullying acceptance in the public sector organizations. (4) Eliminating bullying as a downsizing strategy is essential steps to reduce bullying in public sector organizations

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-11-2024-0387
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmasking organizational factors contributing to bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces: insights from the Australian public sector

Wahed Waheduzzaman, Nikola Djurkovic, Susan R. Quinn
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Unmasking organizational factors contributing to bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces: insights from the Australian public sector

Wahed Waheduzzaman, Nikola Djurkovic, Susan R. Quinn
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the organizational factors associated with bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces, addressing a significant gap in empirical research. The aim is to identify systemic organizational issues that contribute to workplace bullying and offer insights to foster a safer and more respectful work culture within the public sector. By emphasizing organizational influences, this study adopts an institutional perspective, exploring how changes, particularly in the context of new public management (NPM) reforms, create conditions for workplace bullying. Design/methodology/approach The research involved in-depth qualitative interviews with 21 senior-level managers from the Victorian public sector (VPS) in Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data, enabling the identification of key organizational features linked to bullying behaviors. Findings The study identifies several interconnected organizational factors that perpetuate workplace bullying in the public sector. These include a permissive culture that tolerates such behaviors, a lack of consequences for perpetrators and noncompliance with anti-bullying protocols. Additionally, bullying is sometimes strategically used as a workforce downsizing tool, reflecting deeper systemic issues. The absence of accountability mechanisms further exacerbates the problem, creating an environment where bullying behaviors can thrive. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive organizational reforms to address the root causes of workplace bullying. Originality/value By shifting focus from individual traits to systemic organizational factors, this study offers a transformative lens for understanding and combating workplace bullying in the public sector. These insights provide actionable strategies for policymakers and managers aiming to foster respectful and accountable public workplaces. Highlights (1) The transition from traditional rule-based public sector characteristics to market-oriented, performance-driven cultures has introduced aggressive managerial behaviors, creating a conducive environment for bullying. (2) Network-based hiring and the formation of dominant subgroups by executives exacerbate bullying behaviors. (3) Cost-saving measures like transferring victims or perpetrators creates a culture of bullying acceptance in the public sector organizations. (4) Eliminating bullying as a downsizing strategy is essential steps to reduce bullying in public sector organizations

International Journal of Public Sector Management
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.