The Price of Safety: Assessing the Acceptance of COVID-19 Measures in Nordic Countries

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted Nordic governments to implement various measures to control the virus’s spread, impacting individuals in different ways. This study seeks to understand the extent to which people in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) perceive these COVID-19 regulations as reasonable. We conducted surveys among representative samples of citizens in these countries and analyzed the data using linear regression. Our findings indicate a high level of acceptance for these measures, suggesting a willingness to sacrifice significant freedoms in a pandemic crisis. However, this acceptance does not imply that 'anything goes.' Acceptance varies based on individual circumstances and context, aligning with the notion of critical compliance. The study underscores the importance of both state-centered and citizen-based perspectives in understanding public acceptance of pandemic measures. It raises questions about citizens' willingness to sacrifice fundamental human rights and highlights potential negative impacts on democratic standards and values during crises. Our insights can assist policymakers in creating more effective and widely accepted regulations in response to pandemics or similar crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.34399
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Price of Safety: Assessing the Acceptance of COVID-19 Measures in Nordic Countries

Therese Sefton, Are Vegard Haug
1 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.82
article

The Price of Safety: Assessing the Acceptance of COVID-19 Measures in Nordic Countries

Therese Sefton, Are Vegard Haug
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted Nordic governments to implement various measures to control the virus’s spread, impacting individuals in different ways. This study seeks to understand the extent to which people in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) perceive these COVID-19 regulations as reasonable. We conducted surveys among representative samples of citizens in these countries and analyzed the data using linear regression. Our findings indicate a high level of acceptance for these measures, suggesting a willingness to sacrifice significant freedoms in a pandemic crisis. However, this acceptance does not imply that 'anything goes.' Acceptance varies based on individual circumstances and context, aligning with the notion of critical compliance. The study underscores the importance of both state-centered and citizen-based perspectives in understanding public acceptance of pandemic measures. It raises questions about citizens' willingness to sacrifice fundamental human rights and highlights potential negative impacts on democratic standards and values during crises. Our insights can assist policymakers in creating more effective and widely accepted regulations in response to pandemics or similar crises.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
Norwegian Directorate of Health (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd, Universitetet i Agder
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.