Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: Evaluation and Mitigation Techniques

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT, BERT, and LLaMA have transformed natural language processing, yet they exhibit social biases that can reinforce unfair outcomes. This paper systematically evaluates bias and fairness in LLMs across gender, race, and socioeconomic dimensions using benchmark datasets and fairness metrics. We assess bias through template-based probing, stereotype score measurement, and downstream task performance. We implement mitigation strategies including adversarial training, counterfactual data augmentation, and fairness-aware loss functions. Regression and predictive analysis reveal that token frequency and representation distance significantly correlate with bias scores. Post-mitigation analysis shows up to a 48% reduction in bias indicators with minimal accuracy trade-offs. Keywords: Large Language Models, Bias, Fairness, Evaluation, Mitigation, GPT, BERT, Counterfactual Augmentation, SHAP, LIME

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62311/nesx/rphcr6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: Evaluation and Mitigation Techniques

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti
2 citations
International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
5.63
article

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: Evaluation and Mitigation Techniques

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT, BERT, and LLaMA have transformed natural language processing, yet they exhibit social biases that can reinforce unfair outcomes. This paper systematically evaluates bias and fairness in LLMs across gender, race, and socioeconomic dimensions using benchmark datasets and fairness metrics. We assess bias through template-based probing, stereotype score measurement, and downstream task performance. We implement mitigation strategies including adversarial training, counterfactual data augmentation, and fairness-aware loss functions. Regression and predictive analysis reveal that token frequency and representation distance significantly correlate with bias scores. Post-mitigation analysis shows up to a 48% reduction in bias indicators with minimal accuracy trade-offs. Keywords: Large Language Models, Bias, Fairness, Evaluation, Mitigation, GPT, BERT, Counterfactual Augmentation, SHAP, LIME

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)Vol. 05(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: Evaluation and Mitigation Techniques — Murali Krishna Pasupuleti · International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS