A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of Emotional Schemas, Anxiety Sensitivity, Repetitive Negative Thoughts, Cognitive Flexibility, COVID-19 Anxiety, and Attachment to God in Individuals with Mood and Anxiety Disorders

Background: Emotional schemas are pervasive mental structures associated with a wide array of psychological symptoms. Cognitive flexibility (CF) and attachment to God are considered adaptive psychological constructs. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare emotional schemas, anxiety sensitivity (AS), repetitive negative thoughts (RNTs), CF, COVID-19 anxiety, and attachment to God between individuals with mood and anxiety disorders. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 170 participants, categorized into two groups: Eighty four diagnosed with mood disorders and 86 with anxiety disorders. The participants were residents of Tehran, Iran, from January to June 2024. Data collection and comparison across the two groups were conducted using six instruments: The Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), Repetitive Negative Thinking (RNT) Questionnaire, Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI), Attachment to God Inventory (AGI), COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS), and Leahy Emotional Schemas Scale (LESS). ANOVA was used for data analysis with SPSS-26. Results: The Wilk’s Lambda test indicated a significant overall effect of the group (P < 0.001, F = 2.657). Patients with anxiety scored significantly higher on the simplistic view of emotion, devaluation, and alternatives compared to patients with depression. Conversely, patients with depression scored significantly higher on incomprehensibility, guilt, loss of control, duration, low expression, and RNTs than those with anxiety. Conclusions: The study found that RNTs are prevalent in both depression and anxiety, contributing to the exacerbation and persistence of these disorders. Targeting RNTs could benefit selective preventive interventions. Addressing RNTs, emotional schemas, and CF in treatment, along with early selective preventive interventions, may help mitigate their impact. Shared risk factors underscore the importance of early clinical detection and intervention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-156398
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of Emotional Schemas, Anxiety Sensitivity, Repetitive Negative Thoughts, Cognitive Flexibility, COVID-19 Anxiety, and Attachment to God in Individuals with Mood and Anxiety Disorders

Reza Amini, Samira Nasr Abadi, Farideh Nasiri, Jafar Sarani Yaztappeh et al.
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of Emotional Schemas, Anxiety Sensitivity, Repetitive Negative Thoughts, Cognitive Flexibility, COVID-19 Anxiety, and Attachment to God in Individuals with Mood and Anxiety Disorders

Reza Amini, Samira Nasr Abadi, Farideh Nasiri, Jafar Sarani Yaztappeh, Seyedeh Elnaz Mousavi, Parnaz Mardani, Amir Sam Kianimoghadam, Maryam Bakhtiyari, Marzieh Feizi
article en

Abstract

Background: Emotional schemas are pervasive mental structures associated with a wide array of psychological symptoms. Cognitive flexibility (CF) and attachment to God are considered adaptive psychological constructs. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare emotional schemas, anxiety sensitivity (AS), repetitive negative thoughts (RNTs), CF, COVID-19 anxiety, and attachment to God between individuals with mood and anxiety disorders. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 170 participants, categorized into two groups: Eighty four diagnosed with mood disorders and 86 with anxiety disorders. The participants were residents of Tehran, Iran, from January to June 2024. Data collection and comparison across the two groups were conducted using six instruments: The Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), Repetitive Negative Thinking (RNT) Questionnaire, Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI), Attachment to God Inventory (AGI), COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS), and Leahy Emotional Schemas Scale (LESS). ANOVA was used for data analysis with SPSS-26. Results: The Wilk’s Lambda test indicated a significant overall effect of the group (P < 0.001, F = 2.657). Patients with anxiety scored significantly higher on the simplistic view of emotion, devaluation, and alternatives compared to patients with depression. Conversely, patients with depression scored significantly higher on incomprehensibility, guilt, loss of control, duration, low expression, and RNTs than those with anxiety. Conclusions: The study found that RNTs are prevalent in both depression and anxiety, contributing to the exacerbation and persistence of these disorders. Targeting RNTs could benefit selective preventive interventions. Addressing RNTs, emotional schemas, and CF in treatment, along with early selective preventive interventions, may help mitigate their impact. Shared risk factors underscore the importance of early clinical detection and intervention.

Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesVol. 19(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.