Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ‐on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease

Diseases and disorders of dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) tissues represent a significant global health burden and have been found to have the greatest age-standardized prevalence and incidence of all reported diseases worldwide. While the application of novel therapies has been suggested to address the different types of oral health diseases, only a limited number of interventional regenerative therapies have been reported to improve clinical therapeutic outcomes. The lack of novel therapies in DOC tissue regeneration may be in part attributed to the highly resource-intensive translational path from preclinical models to clinical trials. Recently, stakeholders and regulatory agencies have begun to encourage the use of alternative preclinical models using human tissues for testing therapeutic interventions in place of animal models. This advocacy may provide an opportunity to reduce or eliminate animal testing, ultimately limiting resource expenditure and providing a more efficient regulatory pathway for the approval of novel DOC therapies. While the complexity of DOC physiology, defects, and diseases is not effectively recapitulated in traditional 2D or 3D in vitro culture models, the emergence of more sophisticated in vitro models (or so-called microphysiological systems that include spheroid, organoid and organ on-chip (OoC) systems) has enabled effective modeling of clinically simulated disease states in several DOC tissue and organ systems. Here, we aim to provide an overview and collective comparison of these microphysiological systems, outline their current uses in DOC research, and identify important gaps in both their utilization and abilities to recapitulate essential features of native oral-craniofacial physiology, towards enabling the therapeutic performance of de novo interventions targeted at regeneration outcomes in vivo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70020
Citations
7
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ‐on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease

J. Paul Santerre, Zach Gouveia, William V. Giannobile, David T. Wu et al.
7 citations
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
4.72
article

Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ‐on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease

J. Paul Santerre, Zach Gouveia, William V. Giannobile, David T. Wu, Aliçan Özkan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Diseases and disorders of dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) tissues represent a significant global health burden and have been found to have the greatest age-standardized prevalence and incidence of all reported diseases worldwide. While the application of novel therapies has been suggested to address the different types of oral health diseases, only a limited number of interventional regenerative therapies have been reported to improve clinical therapeutic outcomes. The lack of novel therapies in DOC tissue regeneration may be in part attributed to the highly resource-intensive translational path from preclinical models to clinical trials. Recently, stakeholders and regulatory agencies have begun to encourage the use of alternative preclinical models using human tissues for testing therapeutic interventions in place of animal models. This advocacy may provide an opportunity to reduce or eliminate animal testing, ultimately limiting resource expenditure and providing a more efficient regulatory pathway for the approval of novel DOC therapies. While the complexity of DOC physiology, defects, and diseases is not effectively recapitulated in traditional 2D or 3D in vitro culture models, the emergence of more sophisticated in vitro models (or so-called microphysiological systems that include spheroid, organoid and organ on-chip (OoC) systems) has enabled effective modeling of clinically simulated disease states in several DOC tissue and organ systems. Here, we aim to provide an overview and collective comparison of these microphysiological systems, outline their current uses in DOC research, and identify important gaps in both their utilization and abilities to recapitulate essential features of native oral-craniofacial physiology, towards enabling the therapeutic performance of de novo interventions targeted at regeneration outcomes in vivo.

Bioengineering & Translational MedicineVol. 10(5)
Boston University (US), Harvard University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Harvard College Observatory (US), McGill University (CA)
Osteology Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
4.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.