Development of cost‐effective geopolymer mortars from low‐grade metakaolin and bottom ash for <scp>3D</scp> construction printing

Abstract As part of the pursuit for more cost‐effective and sustainable building materials, geopolymers have been a promising substitute for traditional Portland cement with the capability of lowering both carbon footprint and material cost with high mechanical performance. In this work, we explore an economically feasible geopolymer mortar designed for construction 3D printing by assessing four locally sourced precursors: high‐grade metakaolin, low‐grade MK, bottom ash (BA), and ground granulated blast‐furnace slag. When mixed with BA, experimental results show that calcined low‐grade MK provides comparable or superior compressive strength, faster setting, and favorable rheological properties to high‐grade MK mixtures at reduced cost. Rheology tests confirm that such mixtures still have good extrudability and buildability for 3D printing, while microstructural investigations (SEM and XRD) show good geopolymer gel formation. Through the utilization of local by‐products, the process, as suggested, lowers carbon footprint as well as material cost, hence a promising pathway to sustainable additive manufacturing within the construction industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70093
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of cost‐effective geopolymer mortars from low‐grade metakaolin and bottom ash for 3D construction printing

Essam Shehab, J. R. Kim, Md. Hazrat Ali, Bakbergen Temirzakuly et al.
5 citations
Structural Concrete
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
5.03
article

Development of cost‐effective geopolymer mortars from low‐grade metakaolin and bottom ash for 3D construction printing

Essam Shehab, J. R. Kim, Md. Hazrat Ali, Bakbergen Temirzakuly, Dias Nurgaliuly
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract As part of the pursuit for more cost‐effective and sustainable building materials, geopolymers have been a promising substitute for traditional Portland cement with the capability of lowering both carbon footprint and material cost with high mechanical performance. In this work, we explore an economically feasible geopolymer mortar designed for construction 3D printing by assessing four locally sourced precursors: high‐grade metakaolin, low‐grade MK, bottom ash (BA), and ground granulated blast‐furnace slag. When mixed with BA, experimental results show that calcined low‐grade MK provides comparable or superior compressive strength, faster setting, and favorable rheological properties to high‐grade MK mixtures at reduced cost. Rheology tests confirm that such mixtures still have good extrudability and buildability for 3D printing, while microstructural investigations (SEM and XRD) show good geopolymer gel formation. Through the utilization of local by‐products, the process, as suggested, lowers carbon footprint as well as material cost, hence a promising pathway to sustainable additive manufacturing within the construction industry.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(3)
Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Nazarbayev University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of cost‐effective geopolymer mortars from low‐grade metakaolin and bottom ash for <scp>3D</scp> construction printing — Essam Shehab, J. R. Kim, et al. · Structural Concrete (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS