Towards inclusive explainable artificial intelligence: a thematic analysis and scoping review on tools for persons with disabilities

Findings reveal a strong concentration on neurological conditions - such as Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder and Parkinson's disease - with limited focus on orthopaedic, sensory and spinal impairments. SHAP was the most common explanation model, followed by LIME, LRP-B and Grad-CAM. Accessibility goals centred around clinical transparency, user comprehension, sensory/cognitive adaptation and trust in low-resource settings. Thematic analysis identified three overarching dimensions: modelling techniques, decision-making and trust and diverse application contexts. Expanding XAI to underrepresented impairments and embedding multimodal, user-centred explanations into rehabilitation workflows - through participatory design, ethical oversight and standardised evaluation - can enhance autonomy, improve personalisation and support more effective, equitable care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2507684
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards inclusive explainable artificial intelligence: a thematic analysis and scoping review on tools for persons with disabilities

Zahra Atf, Peter R. Lewis
1 links
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Towards inclusive explainable artificial intelligence: a thematic analysis and scoping review on tools for persons with disabilities

Zahra Atf, Peter R. Lewis
article en

Abstract

Findings reveal a strong concentration on neurological conditions - such as Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder and Parkinson's disease - with limited focus on orthopaedic, sensory and spinal impairments. SHAP was the most common explanation model, followed by LIME, LRP-B and Grad-CAM. Accessibility goals centred around clinical transparency, user comprehension, sensory/cognitive adaptation and trust in low-resource settings. Thematic analysis identified three overarching dimensions: modelling techniques, decision-making and trust and diverse application contexts. Expanding XAI to underrepresented impairments and embedding multimodal, user-centred explanations into rehabilitation workflows - through participatory design, ethical oversight and standardised evaluation - can enhance autonomy, improve personalisation and support more effective, equitable care.

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive TechnologyVol. 20(8)
Ontario Tech University (CA), Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.