Arctic Geoengineering Between Governance and Science: A Structured Literature Review of the Arctic Geoengineering Discourse

ABSTRACT As the Arctic is increasingly experiencing the effects of climate change, specific Arctic geoengineering technologies are considered as possible add‐ons to ongoing mitigation efforts. Several technologies are currently discussed, spanning an array of different disciplines and arguments. This paper provides an overview of the ongoing academic discourse on Arctic geoengineering. By using an Environment‐People‐Security lens, the analysis highlights salient points for the governance of both research and possible deployment of geoengineering. Our findings demonstrate a deep divide between existing research approaches in the literature and a disproportionate focus on technology and feasibility studies in comparison with governance research. In view of the many different risks associated with geoengineering, there is an urgent need for interdisciplinarity in both research and governance, considering different stake‐ and rights‐holders, research approaches, and knowledge transitions in the process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arctic Geoengineering Between Governance and Science: A Structured Literature Review of the Arctic Geoengineering Discourse

Federica Catonini, Johanna Sophie Buerkert, Kristian Søby Kristensen
1 citations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.11
article

Arctic Geoengineering Between Governance and Science: A Structured Literature Review of the Arctic Geoengineering Discourse

Federica Catonini, Johanna Sophie Buerkert, Kristian Søby Kristensen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As the Arctic is increasingly experiencing the effects of climate change, specific Arctic geoengineering technologies are considered as possible add‐ons to ongoing mitigation efforts. Several technologies are currently discussed, spanning an array of different disciplines and arguments. This paper provides an overview of the ongoing academic discourse on Arctic geoengineering. By using an Environment‐People‐Security lens, the analysis highlights salient points for the governance of both research and possible deployment of geoengineering. Our findings demonstrate a deep divide between existing research approaches in the literature and a disproportionate focus on technology and feasibility studies in comparison with governance research. In view of the many different risks associated with geoengineering, there is an urgent need for interdisciplinarity in both research and governance, considering different stake‐ and rights‐holders, research approaches, and knowledge transitions in the process.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and EnvironmentVol. 14(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Royal Danish Defence College (DK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Københavns Universitet, NordForsk
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.