Shade tolerance controls the spectrum of crown sizes and its response to local competition across European and North American tree species. Implications for light interception strategies

The size of a tree and its crown are key drivers of its ability to intercept light. These characteristics are also constrained by biomechanical and hydraulic limitations, leading to tremendous variations in crown size and tree height between species. To date, there is no consensus on how covariation between crown characteristics (i.e. tree height, crown diameter and relative crown depth) control the spectrum of crown sizes, nor on the species characteristics (i.e. species climate niche or functional traits) that govern their variation. Using species‐specific allometric relationships accounting for local competition data on individual crown characteristics of tree species across Europe and North America, we showed that the spectrum of tree crown size is mainly driven by two independent axes: one correlating tree height with relative crown depth, and another linking crown diameter to crown volume. While both angiosperms and gymnosperms exhibited similar patterns of covariation for these crown characteristics, distinct ecological strategies emerged for maximum tree height. We also highlighted that shade‐tolerant species were characterized by wider and deeper crowns and showed reduced sensitivity to local competition in relative crown depth, indicating enhanced competitive resilience. Finally, simulations of light interception in virtual stands performed using a ray tracing algorithm highlighted the importance of different crown characteristics in various competitive contexts. Tree height was the primary determinant of light interception in low competitive contexts, common in early successional stages, whereas relative crown depth and crown diameter played a more significant role in high‐competitive contexts typical of late succession. These findings suggest that shade‐tolerant species, with their deeper crowns, are better equipped to intercept light under competition and ultimately emphasize the ability of shade tolerance to improve the realism of forest dynamic models as it can be used as an indicator of crown size and its response to competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.10603
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shade tolerance controls the spectrum of crown sizes and its response to local competition across European and North American tree species. Implications for light interception strategies

Olivier Bouriaud, Miguel Angel Zavala, Christoph Fischer, Tommaso Jucker et al.
3 citations
Oikos
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
article

Shade tolerance controls the spectrum of crown sizes and its response to local competition across European and North American tree species. Implications for light interception strategies

Olivier Bouriaud, Miguel Angel Zavala, Christoph Fischer, Tommaso Jucker, Sophia Etzold, Anne Baranger, Paloma Ruiz‐Benito, Laura Touzot, Benoı̂t Courbaud, Sylvain Delzon, Georges Künstler, Nathéo Beauchamp, Thomas Cordonnier, Arthur Gessler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The size of a tree and its crown are key drivers of its ability to intercept light. These characteristics are also constrained by biomechanical and hydraulic limitations, leading to tremendous variations in crown size and tree height between species. To date, there is no consensus on how covariation between crown characteristics (i.e. tree height, crown diameter and relative crown depth) control the spectrum of crown sizes, nor on the species characteristics (i.e. species climate niche or functional traits) that govern their variation. Using species‐specific allometric relationships accounting for local competition data on individual crown characteristics of tree species across Europe and North America, we showed that the spectrum of tree crown size is mainly driven by two independent axes: one correlating tree height with relative crown depth, and another linking crown diameter to crown volume. While both angiosperms and gymnosperms exhibited similar patterns of covariation for these crown characteristics, distinct ecological strategies emerged for maximum tree height. We also highlighted that shade‐tolerant species were characterized by wider and deeper crowns and showed reduced sensitivity to local competition in relative crown depth, indicating enhanced competitive resilience. Finally, simulations of light interception in virtual stands performed using a ray tracing algorithm highlighted the importance of different crown characteristics in various competitive contexts. Tree height was the primary determinant of light interception in low competitive contexts, common in early successional stages, whereas relative crown depth and crown diameter played a more significant role in high‐competitive contexts typical of late succession. These findings suggest that shade‐tolerant species, with their deeper crowns, are better equipped to intercept light under competition and ultimately emphasize the ability of shade tolerance to improve the realism of forest dynamic models as it can be used as an indicator of crown size and its response to competition.

OikosVol. 2025(8)
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), University of Bristol (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Office National des Forêts (FR), UMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.