Disability policies in South Africa and Sweden: A critical policy analysis from a social work perspective

Abstract Background This study critically examines the central policy documents that regulate care and support for people with disabilities in South Africa and Sweden. Methods The study critically analyses South Africa's White Paper on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Swedish Disability Act. Utilizing the “What's the Problem Represented to be? (WPR)” framework developed by Bacchi, the problematization of disability in these policy documents is discussed. Results Both countries have shifted from a medical model of disability toward a more inclusive, rights‐based approach. While South Africa focuses on addressing historical inequalities and promoting mainstreaming, Sweden prioritizes individual autonomy, personal assistance, and structural support for independent living. Conclusions The analysis reveals that South Africa relies more heavily on family and community support for individuals with disabilities. By contrast, Sweden promotes greater self‐determination for individuals, reducing the burden on families by offering state‐supported personal assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Welfare
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70022
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability policies in South Africa and Sweden: A critical policy analysis from a social work perspective

Ilze Slabbert, Malin Ljungberg, Noreth Muller‐Kluits, Ulla‐Karin Schön
International Journal of Social Welfare
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Disability policies in South Africa and Sweden: A critical policy analysis from a social work perspective

Ilze Slabbert, Malin Ljungberg, Noreth Muller‐Kluits, Ulla‐Karin Schön
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study critically examines the central policy documents that regulate care and support for people with disabilities in South Africa and Sweden. Methods The study critically analyses South Africa's White Paper on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Swedish Disability Act. Utilizing the “What's the Problem Represented to be? (WPR)” framework developed by Bacchi, the problematization of disability in these policy documents is discussed. Results Both countries have shifted from a medical model of disability toward a more inclusive, rights‐based approach. While South Africa focuses on addressing historical inequalities and promoting mainstreaming, Sweden prioritizes individual autonomy, personal assistance, and structural support for independent living. Conclusions The analysis reveals that South Africa relies more heavily on family and community support for individuals with disabilities. By contrast, Sweden promotes greater self‐determination for individuals, reducing the burden on families by offering state‐supported personal assistance.

International Journal of Social WelfareVol. 34(3)
Stockholm University (SE), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.