Affective reactions when learning that our answer is biased: The role of negative feedback in the arousal of epistemic emotions

This study investigated how different types of feedback influence emotional reactions in decision-making tasks involving high-confidence errors. The sample consisted of 596 undergraduate and postgraduate university students. Participants completed tasks and received either low informative feedback (indicating correctness) or high informative feedback (offering detailed explanations of correct answers). They reported their confidence levels and epistemic emotions of surprise, confusion, and curiosity. Participants reported epistemic emotions after each type of feedback. The results showed that confidence ratings did not differ between correct and incorrect answers. Incorrect answers elicited higher levels of surprise, curiosity, and confusion than correct answers. High informative feedback significantly reduced epistemic emotions, especially confusion, compared to low informative feedback. These results highlight the importance of detailed feedback in shaping epistemic emotions and enhancing learning in problem-solving contexts. Implications for research and teaching practices are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.13847
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affective reactions when learning that our answer is biased: The role of negative feedback in the arousal of epistemic emotions

Panayiota Metallidou, Katerina Nerantzaki, Paraskevi Stergiadou
2 citations
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
article

Affective reactions when learning that our answer is biased: The role of negative feedback in the arousal of epistemic emotions

Panayiota Metallidou, Katerina Nerantzaki, Paraskevi Stergiadou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigated how different types of feedback influence emotional reactions in decision-making tasks involving high-confidence errors. The sample consisted of 596 undergraduate and postgraduate university students. Participants completed tasks and received either low informative feedback (indicating correctness) or high informative feedback (offering detailed explanations of correct answers). They reported their confidence levels and epistemic emotions of surprise, confusion, and curiosity. Participants reported epistemic emotions after each type of feedback. The results showed that confidence ratings did not differ between correct and incorrect answers. Incorrect answers elicited higher levels of surprise, curiosity, and confusion than correct answers. High informative feedback significantly reduced epistemic emotions, especially confusion, compared to low informative feedback. These results highlight the importance of detailed feedback in shaping epistemic emotions and enhancing learning in problem-solving contexts. Implications for research and teaching practices are discussed.

Europe’s Journal of PsychologyVol. 21(2)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
European Commission, State Scholarships Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.