Partner support and interactions with communities show mixed effects on governance of community‐based resources

Abstract Community‐based natural resource management is recognized as an effective area‐based conservation approach. Accordingly, conservation organizations worldwide are providing support to local communities seeking to sustainably manage and use their local natural resources. However, there is little understanding of how different types of support provided by partner organizations influence local community governance of these resources. Our data, collected from Fiji using key informant interviews, demonstrates that there is no clear association between partner support and effective community governance of marine resources. While no associations were evident when investigating the effects of partner support on participation and perceived fairness of decision‐making at the village level, some significance was identified when investigating responses by social group. We did find a clearer signal, however, with regards to the types of interaction between partners and communities, such that regional meetings were associated with increased community knowledge of the boundaries of the customary fishing grounds and village meetings were associated with increased ecosystem monitoring. Our work underscores the need to evaluate how different types of support from partner organizations, and the manner in which they interact with communities, impact community‐based conservation initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70063
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partner support and interactions with communities show mixed effects on governance of community‐based resources

Morena Mills, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Alifereti Tawake, Arundhati Jagadish et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Partner support and interactions with communities show mixed effects on governance of community‐based resources

Morena Mills, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Alifereti Tawake, Arundhati Jagadish, Hugh Govan, Margaret Tabunakawai Vakalalabure, Tanya O’Garra, Eleanor Roxburgh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Community‐based natural resource management is recognized as an effective area‐based conservation approach. Accordingly, conservation organizations worldwide are providing support to local communities seeking to sustainably manage and use their local natural resources. However, there is little understanding of how different types of support provided by partner organizations influence local community governance of these resources. Our data, collected from Fiji using key informant interviews, demonstrates that there is no clear association between partner support and effective community governance of marine resources. While no associations were evident when investigating the effects of partner support on participation and perceived fairness of decision‐making at the village level, some significance was identified when investigating responses by social group. We did find a clearer signal, however, with regards to the types of interaction between partners and communities, such that regional meetings were associated with increased community knowledge of the boundaries of the customary fishing grounds and village meetings were associated with increased ecosystem monitoring. Our work underscores the need to evaluate how different types of support from partner organizations, and the manner in which they interact with communities, impact community‐based conservation initiatives.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(6)
Conservation International (US), Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji (FJ), University of the South Pacific (FJ), Imperial College London (GB), Fiji National University (FJ), Nature Conservation Foundation (IN)
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, Middlesex University, Cargill Foundation, British Academy
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.