Evaluating teacher and student perspectives on homework

This study explores primary school teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the practice of assigning homework, with a focus on perceptions of effectiveness, workload, and emotional impact. Despite its widespread use, homework remains a contested aspect of educational practice, and a gap exists in understanding how it is perceived by both educators and learners at the primary level. Addressing this gap, the study adopted a qualitative research design and involved 11 classroom teachers and 11 fifth-grade students. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using semi-structured questions developed by the researcher, and analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicate that while most teachers supported assigning individual homework, they generally opposed group assignments, viewing them as impractical. In contrast, students expressed a preference for tasks that involved experiential learning and minimal writing. They were less supportive of individual assignments, especially those requiring extensive literacy. Teachers suggested that homework should take no more than one hour daily, whereas students favored a shorter duration of approximately twenty minutes. Students also reported predominantly negative emotions associated with homework. These findings highlight the need for reconsidering homework practices to better align with student needs and emotional well-being. Keywords: Emotional response; experiential learning; homework; primary education; student perspective

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Researches Journal
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v15i2.9724
Primary Topic
Parental Involvement in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating teacher and student perspectives on homework

Tanem Ozaygin, Zehra Ozcinar Uzunboylu
Contemporary Educational Researches Journal
Parental Involvement in Education
article

Evaluating teacher and student perspectives on homework

Tanem Ozaygin, Zehra Ozcinar Uzunboylu
article en

Abstract

This study explores primary school teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the practice of assigning homework, with a focus on perceptions of effectiveness, workload, and emotional impact. Despite its widespread use, homework remains a contested aspect of educational practice, and a gap exists in understanding how it is perceived by both educators and learners at the primary level. Addressing this gap, the study adopted a qualitative research design and involved 11 classroom teachers and 11 fifth-grade students. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using semi-structured questions developed by the researcher, and analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicate that while most teachers supported assigning individual homework, they generally opposed group assignments, viewing them as impractical. In contrast, students expressed a preference for tasks that involved experiential learning and minimal writing. They were less supportive of individual assignments, especially those requiring extensive literacy. Teachers suggested that homework should take no more than one hour daily, whereas students favored a shorter duration of approximately twenty minutes. Students also reported predominantly negative emotions associated with homework. These findings highlight the need for reconsidering homework practices to better align with student needs and emotional well-being. Keywords: Emotional response; experiential learning; homework; primary education; student perspective

Contemporary Educational Researches JournalVol. 15(2)
Ministry of Education and Culture (CY), Near East University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Parental Involvement in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.