Exploring pronoun badges in clinical education: Medical students’ experiences and perspectives

Objective: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals face significant discrimination in healthcare settings, often avoiding necessary care due to anticipated bias. To foster inclusive environments, initiatives such as providers wearing pronoun badges have been proposed. However, limited research exists on the impact that health care providers using pronoun badges has on patient and provider experiences. Furthermore, the attitudes of medical students, who will comprise a large part of the clinical workforce in the coming years, towards pronoun badges remain unclear. This study aimed to explore medical student experiences and perspectives on using pronoun badges for a year of clinical work. Setting/Methods: Pronoun badges were distributed to 132 medical students at Harvard Medical School and, after a year of clinical work, students were surveyed about their experiences using the badges. Results: Of 132 eligible students, 65 [49.2%] responded; most respondents (59 [90.8%]) obtained a pronoun badge, and 48 [81.3%] of those who obtained badges wore them consistently. Among badge wearers, 45 [93.8%] planned to continue. An inductive thematic analysis revealed three themes in the responses: reasons to use badges (signalling allyship); reasons to abstain (concerns about patient misunderstanding or personal comfort); and impacts of badge use (fostering conversation). While some negative feedback was reported, most students viewed pronoun badges as effective allyship tools. Conclusions: Pronoun badges were well-received by medical students, with most finding them to be a meaningful way to create affirming clinical environments. The badges served as conversation-starters, signalling inclusivity to patients and staff. However, non-use by both cisgender and TGD students highlighted the importance of personal agency and safety in pronoun disclosure and highlighted the complexity of identity and allyship in medical settings. We suggest that institutions should offer, but not mandate, pronoun badges. While pronoun badges provide an early step towards building TGD-inclusive clinical environments, they must be coupled with broader institutional support for LGBTQ+ inclusivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969251344028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring pronoun badges in clinical education: Medical students’ experiences and perspectives

Anna Roselle, Mary W. Montgomery, Alex S. Keuroghlian, Salvatore Daddario et al.
1 citations
Health Education Journal
Translation Studies and Practices
10.42
article

Exploring pronoun badges in clinical education: Medical students’ experiences and perspectives

Anna Roselle, Mary W. Montgomery, Alex S. Keuroghlian, Salvatore Daddario, Mariah Everett
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals face significant discrimination in healthcare settings, often avoiding necessary care due to anticipated bias. To foster inclusive environments, initiatives such as providers wearing pronoun badges have been proposed. However, limited research exists on the impact that health care providers using pronoun badges has on patient and provider experiences. Furthermore, the attitudes of medical students, who will comprise a large part of the clinical workforce in the coming years, towards pronoun badges remain unclear. This study aimed to explore medical student experiences and perspectives on using pronoun badges for a year of clinical work. Setting/Methods: Pronoun badges were distributed to 132 medical students at Harvard Medical School and, after a year of clinical work, students were surveyed about their experiences using the badges. Results: Of 132 eligible students, 65 [49.2%] responded; most respondents (59 [90.8%]) obtained a pronoun badge, and 48 [81.3%] of those who obtained badges wore them consistently. Among badge wearers, 45 [93.8%] planned to continue. An inductive thematic analysis revealed three themes in the responses: reasons to use badges (signalling allyship); reasons to abstain (concerns about patient misunderstanding or personal comfort); and impacts of badge use (fostering conversation). While some negative feedback was reported, most students viewed pronoun badges as effective allyship tools. Conclusions: Pronoun badges were well-received by medical students, with most finding them to be a meaningful way to create affirming clinical environments. The badges served as conversation-starters, signalling inclusivity to patients and staff. However, non-use by both cisgender and TGD students highlighted the importance of personal agency and safety in pronoun disclosure and highlighted the complexity of identity and allyship in medical settings. We suggest that institutions should offer, but not mandate, pronoun badges. While pronoun badges provide an early step towards building TGD-inclusive clinical environments, they must be coupled with broader institutional support for LGBTQ+ inclusivity.

Health Education JournalVol. 84(6)
Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Translation Studies and Practices
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.