Digital mechanisms for public participation in crisis management of post-war recovery based on digital technologies

This paper examines the methodological foundations for studying digital mechanisms of public participation in crisis management during Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. The author conceptualizes these mechanisms as complex socio-technical systems that integrate institutional, technological, and social dimensions. Employing a systems approach, the research illuminates the interaction between e-participation components within the turbulent post-war environment. The institutional lens enables analysis of formal and informal ‘rules of the game’ that structure the space of online democracy. The participatory focus emphasizes citizens’ role as co-creators of recovery and reconstruction policy. The network perspective highlights the horizontal, collaborative nature of digital communication amongst stakeholders. Particular attention is devoted to the potential of decentralized information platforms (blockchain, DAO) in synergy with big data and artificial intelligence. International case studies illustrate the distinctive features of e-engagement in post-war settings. Based on this analysis, the paper proposes a conceptual model for a digital ecosystem of public participation tailored to post-war Ukraine’s realities (Rebuild Ukraine e-Participation Ecosystem, RUEP). The research outlines implementation prospects and challenges for the coming years. The methodology integrates general scientific approaches, specialized methods for analyzing digital participation, and cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives. This paper should interest e-democracy researchers, public administration practitioners, and civic activists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pressing Problems of Public Administration
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2024-2-01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital mechanisms for public participation in crisis management of post-war recovery based on digital technologies

Dmytro Karamyshev
1 citations
Pressing Problems of Public Administration
E-Government and Public Services
2.23
article

Digital mechanisms for public participation in crisis management of post-war recovery based on digital technologies

Dmytro Karamyshev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the methodological foundations for studying digital mechanisms of public participation in crisis management during Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. The author conceptualizes these mechanisms as complex socio-technical systems that integrate institutional, technological, and social dimensions. Employing a systems approach, the research illuminates the interaction between e-participation components within the turbulent post-war environment. The institutional lens enables analysis of formal and informal ‘rules of the game’ that structure the space of online democracy. The participatory focus emphasizes citizens’ role as co-creators of recovery and reconstruction policy. The network perspective highlights the horizontal, collaborative nature of digital communication amongst stakeholders. Particular attention is devoted to the potential of decentralized information platforms (blockchain, DAO) in synergy with big data and artificial intelligence. International case studies illustrate the distinctive features of e-engagement in post-war settings. Based on this analysis, the paper proposes a conceptual model for a digital ecosystem of public participation tailored to post-war Ukraine’s realities (Rebuild Ukraine e-Participation Ecosystem, RUEP). The research outlines implementation prospects and challenges for the coming years. The methodology integrates general scientific approaches, specialized methods for analyzing digital participation, and cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives. This paper should interest e-democracy researchers, public administration practitioners, and civic activists.

Pressing Problems of Public AdministrationVol. 2(65)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
E-Government and Public Services
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.