Intra-articular Knee Injections and Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Background At least 10% of all patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergo treatment with injectable corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid (HA). Although both have been shown to help with symptomatic pain relief, their long-term effects on knee OA progression remain inconclusive. Purpose To investigate the association between intra-articular knee injections, specifically corticosteroids and HA, and OA progression using a detailed whole-joint semiquantitative MRI evaluation and clinical outcomes for a period of 2 years. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis uses data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study (February 2004 to January 2015). Participants who received a reported injection of corticosteroid or HA and propensity-score-matched controls (on age, sex, body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], and clinical variables) were analyzed. Using the Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS) system for cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and meniscus, 3-T MRI performed at the time of injection, 2 years prior, and 2 years after were semiquantitatively graded. Postinjection progression was quantified using WORMS difference between time of injection and the 2-year follow-up. Associations with injection type were analyzed using repeated measures of analysis of covariance. Results There were 210 participants analyzed (mean age, 64 years ± 7.9 years [SD]; 126 female participants). Corticosteroids were associated with greater WORMS progression compared with controls (mean difference, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.75; <i>P</i> = .02) and HA (0.42; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .04). HA was associated with decreased WORMS progression compared with the injection-concurrent time frame (mean difference, -0.42; 95% CI: -1.34, -0.28; <i>P</i> = .003). Both corticosteroids (mean difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores, -5.20; 95% CI: -6.91, -3.48; <i>P</i> = .001) and HA injections (-2.15; 95% CI: -4.42, -0.13; <i>P</i> = .04) were associated with reduced pain after injection. Conclusion Corticosteroid injections were associated with higher OA progression than HA injections and controls, whereas HA was associated with decreased progression at MRI for up to 2 years after injection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00080171 © RSNA, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233081
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intra-articular Knee Injections and Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Michael C. Nevitt, Charles E. McCulloch, Gabby B. Joseph, N.E. Lane et al.
6 citations
Radiology
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
10.01
article

Intra-articular Knee Injections and Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Michael C. Nevitt, Charles E. McCulloch, Gabby B. Joseph, N.E. Lane, Upasana Bharadwaj, Thomas M. Link, Zehra Akkaya, J.A. Lynch
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Background At least 10% of all patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergo treatment with injectable corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid (HA). Although both have been shown to help with symptomatic pain relief, their long-term effects on knee OA progression remain inconclusive. Purpose To investigate the association between intra-articular knee injections, specifically corticosteroids and HA, and OA progression using a detailed whole-joint semiquantitative MRI evaluation and clinical outcomes for a period of 2 years. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis uses data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study (February 2004 to January 2015). Participants who received a reported injection of corticosteroid or HA and propensity-score-matched controls (on age, sex, body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], and clinical variables) were analyzed. Using the Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS) system for cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and meniscus, 3-T MRI performed at the time of injection, 2 years prior, and 2 years after were semiquantitatively graded. Postinjection progression was quantified using WORMS difference between time of injection and the 2-year follow-up. Associations with injection type were analyzed using repeated measures of analysis of covariance. Results There were 210 participants analyzed (mean age, 64 years ± 7.9 years [SD]; 126 female participants). Corticosteroids were associated with greater WORMS progression compared with controls (mean difference, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.75; <i>P</i> = .02) and HA (0.42; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .04). HA was associated with decreased WORMS progression compared with the injection-concurrent time frame (mean difference, -0.42; 95% CI: -1.34, -0.28; <i>P</i> = .003). Both corticosteroids (mean difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores, -5.20; 95% CI: -6.91, -3.48; <i>P</i> = .001) and HA injections (-2.15; 95% CI: -4.42, -0.13; <i>P</i> = .04) were associated with reduced pain after injection. Conclusion Corticosteroid injections were associated with higher OA progression than HA injections and controls, whereas HA was associated with decreased progression at MRI for up to 2 years after injection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00080171 © RSNA, 2025.

RadiologyVol. 315(2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Berry (United States) (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
10.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.