(Re)mapping the terrain of historical significance: compiling an atlas of frameworks and criteria

This theory synthesis article aims at (re)mapping frameworks and criteria used in the conceptual landscape of historical significance. The analysis connects and unpacks a diverse range of conceptual frameworks, and concludes that these frameworks represent a broad spectrum of criteria, rather than a unified consensus. The mapping also results in two distinct areas within the landscape: the Research terrain, containing conceptual tools for research on students’ perspectives on historical significance, and the Education terrain, equipped with didactical frameworks developed for the classroom. A compilation of the criteria drawn from the included frameworks is also undertaken. In doing this, the concepts of objective and subjective dimensions of epistemic knowledge are used to sort, unpack and problematise the criteria. This study provides theoretical, didactical and methodological insights into the area of historical significance, offering a tentative atlas to facilitate researchers and educators in navigating this landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History Education Research Journal
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/herj.22.1.11
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Re)mapping the terrain of historical significance: compiling an atlas of frameworks and criteria

Cathrine Sjölund Åhsberg
History Education Research Journal
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

(Re)mapping the terrain of historical significance: compiling an atlas of frameworks and criteria

Cathrine Sjölund Åhsberg
article en

Abstract

This theory synthesis article aims at (re)mapping frameworks and criteria used in the conceptual landscape of historical significance. The analysis connects and unpacks a diverse range of conceptual frameworks, and concludes that these frameworks represent a broad spectrum of criteria, rather than a unified consensus. The mapping also results in two distinct areas within the landscape: the Research terrain, containing conceptual tools for research on students’ perspectives on historical significance, and the Education terrain, equipped with didactical frameworks developed for the classroom. A compilation of the criteria drawn from the included frameworks is also undertaken. In doing this, the concepts of objective and subjective dimensions of epistemic knowledge are used to sort, unpack and problematise the criteria. This study provides theoretical, didactical and methodological insights into the area of historical significance, offering a tentative atlas to facilitate researchers and educators in navigating this landscape.

History Education Research JournalVol. 22(1)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.