Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa

This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of two psychological scales developed to measure academic procrastination and achievement motivation among university students. The validity of the instruments was assessed using Pearson Product-Moment correlation, while internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. A pilot study was conducted with a sample of 20 students outside the main study program to ensure the instruments' objectivity. The results showed that out of 28 items on the academic procrastination achievement motivation scale, 21 items were valid, with a reliability score of α =0.872. Meanwhile, the acheivement motivation academic procrastination scale consisted of 40 items, of which 32 items were valid, and the reliability coefficient was α = 0.883. These findings indicate that both instruments have strong psychometric properties and are suitable for use in psychological and educational research. The study highlights the importance of instrument development procedures, including item analysis and pre-testing, to ensure accurate and consistent measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.666
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa

Irman Irman, Siska Putri Ayu, Fadhilah Syafwar, Ryan Hidayat Rafiola
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan
Education and Character Development
article

Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa

Irman Irman, Siska Putri Ayu, Fadhilah Syafwar, Ryan Hidayat Rafiola
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of two psychological scales developed to measure academic procrastination and achievement motivation among university students. The validity of the instruments was assessed using Pearson Product-Moment correlation, while internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. A pilot study was conducted with a sample of 20 students outside the main study program to ensure the instruments' objectivity. The results showed that out of 28 items on the academic procrastination achievement motivation scale, 21 items were valid, with a reliability score of α =0.872. Meanwhile, the acheivement motivation academic procrastination scale consisted of 40 items, of which 32 items were valid, and the reliability coefficient was α = 0.883. These findings indicate that both instruments have strong psychometric properties and are suitable for use in psychological and educational research. The study highlights the importance of instrument development procedures, including item analysis and pre-testing, to ensure accurate and consistent measurement.

Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset PendidikanVol. 3(4)
State University of Gorontalo (ID), State University of Makassar (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Character Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa — Irman Irman, Siska Putri Ayu, et al. · Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS