Towards Consumption-Based Carbon Inequality Metrics: Socioeconomic and Demographic Insights from Chinese Households

The choice of carbon inequality metrics can significantly influence demand-side mitigation policies and their equity outcomes. We propose integrated carbon inequality metrics, including juxtaposing carbon inequality with economic inequality, disparity ratios across income and age groups, and structural income–urbanization inequality patterns. We then apply these new metrics and use the household expenditure survey data from China Family Panel Studies as a case study to examine household consumption-based carbon emissions in China. We assess the extent to which household consumption patterns, household expenditure, age, and urbanization contribute to the gap in per-capita household carbon footprints (CF) across income groups. We find that in relative terms, the top 20% income group accounts for 38% of total emissions, whereas the bottom 20% emit about 8% in China. Per-capita CFs vary slightly widely in their inequality than expenditure. The CF disparity ratios of all eight consumption categories across provinces concentrate around 4.5. CF disparity ratios of households with elderly members range from 1 to 3 and decrease with increasing household size. Rural CF-Gini exhibit a slightly wider range (0.15 to 0.52) than urban CF-Gini (0.16 to 0.42). Per capita CF of urban inhabitants was substantially larger than that of the rural ones, with 8.83 tCO2 per capita in urban regions vs. 2.68 tCO2 in rural regions. This study provides a nuanced understanding of within-country disparities to inform equitable demand-side mitigation solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114916
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Consumption-Based Carbon Inequality Metrics: Socioeconomic and Demographic Insights from Chinese Households

Tian Shen, Thomas Wiedmann, Mo Li
1 citations
Sustainability
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

Towards Consumption-Based Carbon Inequality Metrics: Socioeconomic and Demographic Insights from Chinese Households

Tian Shen, Thomas Wiedmann, Mo Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The choice of carbon inequality metrics can significantly influence demand-side mitigation policies and their equity outcomes. We propose integrated carbon inequality metrics, including juxtaposing carbon inequality with economic inequality, disparity ratios across income and age groups, and structural income–urbanization inequality patterns. We then apply these new metrics and use the household expenditure survey data from China Family Panel Studies as a case study to examine household consumption-based carbon emissions in China. We assess the extent to which household consumption patterns, household expenditure, age, and urbanization contribute to the gap in per-capita household carbon footprints (CF) across income groups. We find that in relative terms, the top 20% income group accounts for 38% of total emissions, whereas the bottom 20% emit about 8% in China. Per-capita CFs vary slightly widely in their inequality than expenditure. The CF disparity ratios of all eight consumption categories across provinces concentrate around 4.5. CF disparity ratios of households with elderly members range from 1 to 3 and decrease with increasing household size. Rural CF-Gini exhibit a slightly wider range (0.15 to 0.52) than urban CF-Gini (0.16 to 0.42). Per capita CF of urban inhabitants was substantially larger than that of the rural ones, with 8.83 tCO2 per capita in urban regions vs. 2.68 tCO2 in rural regions. This study provides a nuanced understanding of within-country disparities to inform equitable demand-side mitigation solutions.

SustainabilityVol. 17(11)
UNSW Sydney (AU), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.