“Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets

How does growth encode form in developing organisms? Many different spatiotemporal growth profiles may sculpt tissues into the same target 3D shapes, but only specific growth patterns are observed in animal and plant development. In particular, growth profiles may differ in their degree of spatial variation and growth anisotropy; however, the criteria that distinguish observed patterns of growth from other possible alternatives are not understood. Here we exploit the mathematical formalism of quasiconformal transformations to formulate the problem of “growth pattern selection” quantitatively in the context of 3D shape formation by growing 2D epithelial sheets. We propose that nature settles on growth patterns that are the “simplest” in a certain way. Specifically, we demonstrate that growth pattern selection can be formulated as an optimization problem and solved for the trajectories that minimize spatiotemporal variation in areal growth rates and deformation anisotropy. The result is a complete prediction for the growth of the surface, including not only a set of intermediate shapes, but also a prediction for cell displacement along those surfaces in the process of growth. Optimization of growth trajectories for both idealized surfaces and those observed in nature show that relative growth rates can be uniformized at the cost of introducing anisotropy. Minimizing the variation of programmed growth rates can therefore be viewed as a generic mechanism for growth pattern selection and may help us to understand the prevalence of anisotropy in developmental programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review X
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.15.021068
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets

Anastasios Pavlopoulos, Boris I. Shraiman, Dillon Cislo
2 citations
Physical Review X
Advanced Materials and Mechanics
1.43
article

“Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets

Anastasios Pavlopoulos, Boris I. Shraiman, Dillon Cislo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How does growth encode form in developing organisms? Many different spatiotemporal growth profiles may sculpt tissues into the same target 3D shapes, but only specific growth patterns are observed in animal and plant development. In particular, growth profiles may differ in their degree of spatial variation and growth anisotropy; however, the criteria that distinguish observed patterns of growth from other possible alternatives are not understood. Here we exploit the mathematical formalism of quasiconformal transformations to formulate the problem of “growth pattern selection” quantitatively in the context of 3D shape formation by growing 2D epithelial sheets. We propose that nature settles on growth patterns that are the “simplest” in a certain way. Specifically, we demonstrate that growth pattern selection can be formulated as an optimization problem and solved for the trajectories that minimize spatiotemporal variation in areal growth rates and deformation anisotropy. The result is a complete prediction for the growth of the surface, including not only a set of intermediate shapes, but also a prediction for cell displacement along those surfaces in the process of growth. Optimization of growth trajectories for both idealized surfaces and those observed in nature show that relative growth rates can be uniformized at the cost of introducing anisotropy. Minimizing the variation of programmed growth rates can therefore be viewed as a generic mechanism for growth pattern selection and may help us to understand the prevalence of anisotropy in developmental programs.

Physical Review XVol. 15(2)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (BG), Rockefeller University (US), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Materials and Mechanics
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.