Phase 2 trial of cyclosporine-A, mycophenolate mofetil, and tocilizumab GVHD prophylaxis in cord blood transplantation

Double-unit cord blood transplantation (dCBT) has been associated with high rates of progression-free survival (PFS) in adults with hematologic malignancies but also with relatively high rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial that investigated the addition of tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker, to cyclosporine-A (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for aGVHD prophylaxis after intermediate-intensity dCBT. A total of 45 patients (median age, 47 years; range, 27-60 years; 80% acute leukemia; median hematopoietic cell transplant-comorbidity index, 2) were enrolled from March 2018 to March 2021. Transplant outcomes were compared with 39 previous CSA and MMF dCBT controls with similar inclusion criteria. Tocilizumab recipients had less pre-engraftment syndrome (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24-52 vs 72%; 95% CI, 54-84; P < .001) but inferior day 45 neutrophil engraftment (93%; median, 25.5 days vs 97%; median, 22 days; P = .009]. The primary end point of day 100 grade 2 to 4 aGVHD was no different between groups (71%; 95% CI, 55-82 with tocilizumab vs 82%; 95% CI, 65-91; P = .11). However, there was a trend toward a lower day 100 incidence of stage 1 to 4 lower gastrointestinal aGVHD with tocilizumab (16%; 95% CI, 7-28 vs 33%; 95% CI, 19-48; P = .059). There were no significant differences in the 3-year incidences of relapse, transplant-related mortality, PFS, or overall survival between the groups. Tocilizumab recipients exhibited a distinct pattern of gut microbiome disruption. In summary, tocilizumab-based GVHD prophylaxis delayed neutrophil recovery without a significant reduction in aGVHD and had no survival benefit after dCBT. Investigation of alternative strategies to prevent severe aGVHD after dCBT is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03434730.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014177
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase 2 trial of cyclosporine-A, mycophenolate mofetil, and tocilizumab GVHD prophylaxis in cord blood transplantation

Alan M. Hanash, Stephanie Chinapen, Stephen Eng, Samantha Brown et al.
2 citations
Blood Advances
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
3.54
article

Phase 2 trial of cyclosporine-A, mycophenolate mofetil, and tocilizumab GVHD prophylaxis in cord blood transplantation

Alan M. Hanash, Stephanie Chinapen, Stephen Eng, Samantha Brown, Joshua Fein, Ann Alice Jakubowski, Jonathan U. Peled, James W. Young, Parastoo Bahrami Dahi, Sean Quach, Esperanza B. Papadopoulos, Brian C. Shaffer, Doris M. Ponce, Boglarka Gyurkocza, Sergio A. Giralt, Juliet N. Barker, Miguel‐Angel Perales, Roni Tamari, Andromachi Scaradavou, Ioannis Politikos, Christina Cho, Sean Devlin, Kristian Casem
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Double-unit cord blood transplantation (dCBT) has been associated with high rates of progression-free survival (PFS) in adults with hematologic malignancies but also with relatively high rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial that investigated the addition of tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker, to cyclosporine-A (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for aGVHD prophylaxis after intermediate-intensity dCBT. A total of 45 patients (median age, 47 years; range, 27-60 years; 80% acute leukemia; median hematopoietic cell transplant-comorbidity index, 2) were enrolled from March 2018 to March 2021. Transplant outcomes were compared with 39 previous CSA and MMF dCBT controls with similar inclusion criteria. Tocilizumab recipients had less pre-engraftment syndrome (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24-52 vs 72%; 95% CI, 54-84; P < .001) but inferior day 45 neutrophil engraftment (93%; median, 25.5 days vs 97%; median, 22 days; P = .009]. The primary end point of day 100 grade 2 to 4 aGVHD was no different between groups (71%; 95% CI, 55-82 with tocilizumab vs 82%; 95% CI, 65-91; P = .11). However, there was a trend toward a lower day 100 incidence of stage 1 to 4 lower gastrointestinal aGVHD with tocilizumab (16%; 95% CI, 7-28 vs 33%; 95% CI, 19-48; P = .059). There were no significant differences in the 3-year incidences of relapse, transplant-related mortality, PFS, or overall survival between the groups. Tocilizumab recipients exhibited a distinct pattern of gut microbiome disruption. In summary, tocilizumab-based GVHD prophylaxis delayed neutrophil recovery without a significant reduction in aGVHD and had no survival benefit after dCBT. Investigation of alternative strategies to prevent severe aGVHD after dCBT is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03434730.

Blood AdvancesVol. 9(10)
Hackensack University Medical Center (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Cornell University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.