Randomised Comparison of Culotte- versus Double Kissing Crush Stenting in de novo non-left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Rationale and Design of the Bifurcation Bad Krozingen trial-3 (BBK-3)

Whether culotte or double kissing (DK)-crush stenting is the superior systematic 2-stent technique in non-left main bifurcation lesions is unclear. The BBK-3 (unique identifier NCT04192760) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that culotte stenting reduces maximal percent diameter restenosis at 9-month follow-up compared to DK-crush stenting in de-novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions using approved, third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). A total of 400 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a two-stent strategy. The primary study endpoint is the maximal percent diameter in-stent restenosis within the bifurcation at 9 months, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints include target lesion revascularization (TLR), the composite of death and myocardial infarction, emergent cardiac bypass surgery and TLR (MACE) at 12 months. BBK-3 will assist in the identification of the preferable, contemporary 2-stent strategy in the treatment of de-novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-025-10626-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomised Comparison of Culotte- versus Double Kissing Crush Stenting in de novo non-left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Rationale and Design of the Bifurcation Bad Krozingen trial-3 (BBK-3)

Franz‐Josef Neumann, Adnan Kastrati, Samuel Tobias Sossalla, Philipp Breitbart et al.
3 citations
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
6.02
article

Randomised Comparison of Culotte- versus Double Kissing Crush Stenting in de novo non-left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Rationale and Design of the Bifurcation Bad Krozingen trial-3 (BBK-3)

Franz‐Josef Neumann, Adnan Kastrati, Samuel Tobias Sossalla, Philipp Breitbart, Kilian Franke, Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Tau Hartikainen, Constantin von zur Mühlen, Christoph B. Olivier, Christian Valina, Nikolaus Löffelhardt, Jan Minners, Mirosław Ferenc, Faridun Rahimi, Albrecht Elsaesser, Dirk Westermann, Felix Woitek, Thomas Nührenberg, Willibald Hochholzer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Whether culotte or double kissing (DK)-crush stenting is the superior systematic 2-stent technique in non-left main bifurcation lesions is unclear. The BBK-3 (unique identifier NCT04192760) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that culotte stenting reduces maximal percent diameter restenosis at 9-month follow-up compared to DK-crush stenting in de-novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions using approved, third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). A total of 400 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a two-stent strategy. The primary study endpoint is the maximal percent diameter in-stent restenosis within the bifurcation at 9 months, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints include target lesion revascularization (TLR), the composite of death and myocardial infarction, emergent cardiac bypass surgery and TLR (MACE) at 12 months. BBK-3 will assist in the identification of the preferable, contemporary 2-stent strategy in the treatment of de-novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions.

Journal of Cardiovascular Translational ResearchVol. 18(4)
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Klinikum Oldenburg (DE), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen (DE), Kerckhoff Klinik (DE), Klinikum Würzburg Mitte (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Boston Scientific Corporation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.