The right to maintenance and the right to raise a child: problems of provision in practice

Purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of theory and practice caused by the inability of parents to raise a child due to their arrears in alimony. The absence of a definition of the concept of malicious evasion of alimony payments in the law does not allow for a correct differentiation of the actions of parents who are malicious defaulters and parents who cannot fulfill their obligations to support a child for objective reasons. In order to implement the principle of priority protection of children’s rights, protecting their right to receive maintenance, the author proves the need to create an institution of an alimony fund, from which children who do not receive maintenance from their parents could receive it from the state. It is determined that such a payment does not exempt parents from fulfilling their obligations to support a child; the funds received from the state must be returned after the reasons for the parents’ failure to pay funds for their child have disappeared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lobbying in the Legislative Process
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2782-7372-2025-4-1-35-41
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The right to maintenance and the right to raise a child: problems of provision in practice

NATALIA LETOVA
Lobbying in the Legislative Process
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

The right to maintenance and the right to raise a child: problems of provision in practice

NATALIA LETOVA
article en

Abstract

Purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of theory and practice caused by the inability of parents to raise a child due to their arrears in alimony. The absence of a definition of the concept of malicious evasion of alimony payments in the law does not allow for a correct differentiation of the actions of parents who are malicious defaulters and parents who cannot fulfill their obligations to support a child for objective reasons. In order to implement the principle of priority protection of children’s rights, protecting their right to receive maintenance, the author proves the need to create an institution of an alimony fund, from which children who do not receive maintenance from their parents could receive it from the state. It is determined that such a payment does not exempt parents from fulfilling their obligations to support a child; the funds received from the state must be returned after the reasons for the parents’ failure to pay funds for their child have disappeared.

Lobbying in the Legislative ProcessVol. 4(1)
Institute of State and Law (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.