A first step towards a standardized iron fuel: Safety characteristics of several pure iron powders

• Four reduced iron powders were analyzed on their safety characteristics. • Three different reduction methods were used. • A general estimation for safety characteristics for iron powders is presented. While the use of iron powder as a dense energy carrier has clear advantages over other carriers such as hydrogen and ammonia in terms of health and safety, risks may still emerge from the powder if accidentally dispersed in air during handling, transport and storage. Since the safety characteristics of dusts are affected by, among others, its particle size distribution, chemical properties and moisture content, it is hard to implement safety measures and select the most promising reduction method without a prior explosion testing. Various production and reduction methods are currently being investigated, each producing a morphologically different type of powder. In one of the key databases on safety characteristics of dusts from the Federation of the Statutory Accident lnsurance of Germany, the maximum explosion pressure ranges from non-explosible (=0) to 5.1 bar and the deflagration index goes up to 111 bar*m /s. In this work the safety characteristics of four different iron dusts, produced via three different reduction methods, are investigated using a 20-Liter sphere according to ISO/IEC 80079–20-2:2016–12 (explosibility). Three of the dusts were found to be explosible and were further tested according to EN 14034–1 (maximum explosion pressure) and EN 14034–2 (maximum rate of pressure rise). Though they were found explosible they were all categorized in dust class St1 as mildly explosible. The morphology of the powder was analyzed before the explosion tests using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The particle size distribution was also determined. Since the chemical properties and the moisture content are known, the findings may be applicable to implementation at larger scale without prior testing of every powder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135824
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nuclear Materials and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A first step towards a standardized iron fuel: Safety characteristics of several pure iron powders

R.T.E. Hermanns, C.J.M. Hessels, Nicole C. Stevens, Arne Krietsch et al.
2 citations
Fuel
Nuclear Materials and Properties
1.04
article

A first step towards a standardized iron fuel: Safety characteristics of several pure iron powders

R.T.E. Hermanns, C.J.M. Hessels, Nicole C. Stevens, Arne Krietsch, Ekaterina Makarova, Ivan Lorenzon, Shrabanee Sen, Albert C. van Genderen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Four reduced iron powders were analyzed on their safety characteristics. • Three different reduction methods were used. • A general estimation for safety characteristics for iron powders is presented. While the use of iron powder as a dense energy carrier has clear advantages over other carriers such as hydrogen and ammonia in terms of health and safety, risks may still emerge from the powder if accidentally dispersed in air during handling, transport and storage. Since the safety characteristics of dusts are affected by, among others, its particle size distribution, chemical properties and moisture content, it is hard to implement safety measures and select the most promising reduction method without a prior explosion testing. Various production and reduction methods are currently being investigated, each producing a morphologically different type of powder. In one of the key databases on safety characteristics of dusts from the Federation of the Statutory Accident lnsurance of Germany, the maximum explosion pressure ranges from non-explosible (=0) to 5.1 bar and the deflagration index goes up to 111 bar*m /s. In this work the safety characteristics of four different iron dusts, produced via three different reduction methods, are investigated using a 20-Liter sphere according to ISO/IEC 80079–20-2:2016–12 (explosibility). Three of the dusts were found to be explosible and were further tested according to EN 14034–1 (maximum explosion pressure) and EN 14034–2 (maximum rate of pressure rise). Though they were found explosible they were all categorized in dust class St1 as mildly explosible. The morphology of the powder was analyzed before the explosion tests using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The particle size distribution was also determined. Since the chemical properties and the moisture content are known, the findings may be applicable to implementation at larger scale without prior testing of every powder.

FuelVol. 400
DSM (Netherlands) (NL), Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE), Veneto Innovazione (Italy) (IT), University of Education Schwaebisch Gmuend (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Nuclear Materials and Properties
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.