Comparative study of gas testing protocols in clayey rocks for nuclear waste repositories

Understanding gas transport processes in clay barriers is crucial for assessing the long-term safety of geological repositories for radioactive waste. Fundamental and well-designed experimental research at the laboratory scale is an indispensable prerequisite for conceptualising gas transport mechanisms and their simulation at repository scales. In practice, however, it turns out that comparing gas invasion experiments on argillaceous rock samples is difficult since different laboratories use different test protocols. This paper presents a collaborative and comparative study conducted by two teams from the Geotechnical Laboratory at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC, Spain) and the Laboratory of Soil Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne (LMS/EPFL, Switzerland), carried out as part of the European Joint Programme EURAD. Both teams employed equivalent gas testing protocols to characterise two argillaceous host rocks: Boom Clay (Belgium) and Opalinus Clay (Switzerland). The integrated workflow enabled the determination of common features regarding the hydro-mechanical response of the tested samples. This research underscores the importance of verifiable testing methods to enhance the understanding of gas transport in geological repositories. The results highlight the benefits of coordinated efforts and shared methodologies in advancing geotechnical research and fostering collaboration among national agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Geotechnics
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.24.00185
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of gas testing protocols in clayey rocks for nuclear waste repositories

Qazim Llabjani, Lyesse Laloui, Laura Gonzalez‐Blanco, Alessio Ferrari et al.
2 citations
Environmental Geotechnics
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.73
article

Comparative study of gas testing protocols in clayey rocks for nuclear waste repositories

Qazim Llabjani, Lyesse Laloui, Laura Gonzalez‐Blanco, Alessio Ferrari, Enrique Romero, Paul Marschall
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding gas transport processes in clay barriers is crucial for assessing the long-term safety of geological repositories for radioactive waste. Fundamental and well-designed experimental research at the laboratory scale is an indispensable prerequisite for conceptualising gas transport mechanisms and their simulation at repository scales. In practice, however, it turns out that comparing gas invasion experiments on argillaceous rock samples is difficult since different laboratories use different test protocols. This paper presents a collaborative and comparative study conducted by two teams from the Geotechnical Laboratory at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC, Spain) and the Laboratory of Soil Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne (LMS/EPFL, Switzerland), carried out as part of the European Joint Programme EURAD. Both teams employed equivalent gas testing protocols to characterise two argillaceous host rocks: Boom Clay (Belgium) and Opalinus Clay (Switzerland). The integrated workflow enabled the determination of common features regarding the hydro-mechanical response of the tested samples. This research underscores the importance of verifiable testing methods to enhance the understanding of gas transport in geological repositories. The results highlight the benefits of coordinated efforts and shared methodologies in advancing geotechnical research and fostering collaboration among national agencies.

Environmental Geotechnics
International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (ES), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Palermo (IT), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.