Understanding PrEP misconceptions and their impact on PrEP initiation and use among pregnant and lactating women in Malawi

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV remains a challenge in Eastern and Southern Africa. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a powerful tool to reduce MTCT, but women face barriers to effective use including those related to inaccurate comprehension of PrEP To understand women's misconceptions about PrEP and their potential impact on PrEP use, we conducted interviews with 33 pregnant and lactating women in Malawi using PrEP, and ten PrEP counselors and clinicians. The results indicate that, although pregnant women generally understood PrEP's features and functions, many held misconceptions that persisted over the course of their PrEP use and impacted their perceptions and use of the medication. Some women erroneously believed that PrEP could treat and prevent sexually transmitted infections other than HIV, which motivated some to keep taking PrEP while motivating others to stop using PrEP once their STI had resolved. Some were confused about PrEP's function, with some believing it was the same as antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment, and others believing that PrEP could be used for overall enhancement of health. Rarer misconceptions included fears that PrEP was connected to satanic practices, could cause cancer, or was solely for individuals engaged in sex work. These misconceptions stemmed from a mix of prior knowledge, societal influences, and miscommunications during counseling sessions. Ensuring accurate knowledge and addressing common misconceptions head-on is crucial to promote continued PrEP use among women. Both clinic- and community-based communication efforts with a particular focus on the difference between PrEP, STI treatments, and ART are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004667
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding PrEP misconceptions and their impact on PrEP initiation and use among pregnant and lactating women in Malawi

Suzanne Maman, Alinda M. Young, Carol E. Golin, Friday Saidi et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
1.40
article

Understanding PrEP misconceptions and their impact on PrEP initiation and use among pregnant and lactating women in Malawi

Suzanne Maman, Alinda M. Young, Carol E. Golin, Friday Saidi, Jennifer Tseka, H. Benjamin, Agatha Kapatuka Bula, Wilbroad Mutale, Twambilile Phanga, Lauren M. Hill, Lisa D. Pearce, Marley Catlett
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV remains a challenge in Eastern and Southern Africa. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a powerful tool to reduce MTCT, but women face barriers to effective use including those related to inaccurate comprehension of PrEP To understand women's misconceptions about PrEP and their potential impact on PrEP use, we conducted interviews with 33 pregnant and lactating women in Malawi using PrEP, and ten PrEP counselors and clinicians. The results indicate that, although pregnant women generally understood PrEP's features and functions, many held misconceptions that persisted over the course of their PrEP use and impacted their perceptions and use of the medication. Some women erroneously believed that PrEP could treat and prevent sexually transmitted infections other than HIV, which motivated some to keep taking PrEP while motivating others to stop using PrEP once their STI had resolved. Some were confused about PrEP's function, with some believing it was the same as antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment, and others believing that PrEP could be used for overall enhancement of health. Rarer misconceptions included fears that PrEP was connected to satanic practices, could cause cancer, or was solely for individuals engaged in sex work. These misconceptions stemmed from a mix of prior knowledge, societal influences, and miscommunications during counseling sessions. Ensuring accurate knowledge and addressing common misconceptions head-on is crucial to promote continued PrEP use among women. Both clinic- and community-based communication efforts with a particular focus on the difference between PrEP, STI treatments, and ART are needed.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), RTI International (US), University of Zambia (ZM)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Fogarty International Center, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.