Selecting Penalty Parameters of High-Dimensional M-Estimators Using Bootstrapping after Cross Validation

We develop a new method for selecting the penalty parameter for ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimators in high dimensions, which we refer to as bootstrapping after cross validation. We derive rates of convergence for the corresponding ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimator and also for the post-ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimator, which refits the nonzero entries of the former estimator without penalty in the criterion function. We demonstrate via simulations that our methods are not dominated by cross validation in terms of estimation errors and can outperform cross validation in terms of inference. As an empirical illustration, we revisit Fryer (2019), who investigated racial differences in police use of force, and confirm his findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/736770
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting Penalty Parameters of High-Dimensional M-Estimators Using Bootstrapping after Cross Validation

Jesper Sørensen, Denis Chetverikov
1 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

Selecting Penalty Parameters of High-Dimensional M-Estimators Using Bootstrapping after Cross Validation

Jesper Sørensen, Denis Chetverikov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We develop a new method for selecting the penalty parameter for ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimators in high dimensions, which we refer to as bootstrapping after cross validation. We derive rates of convergence for the corresponding ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimator and also for the post-ℓ<sub>1</sub>-penalized M-estimator, which refits the nonzero entries of the former estimator without penalty in the criterion function. We demonstrate via simulations that our methods are not dominated by cross validation in terms of estimation errors and can outperform cross validation in terms of inference. As an empirical illustration, we revisit Fryer (2019), who investigated racial differences in police use of force, and confirm his findings.

Journal of Political Economy
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.