Next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to double prompt <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> hadroproducti

Within the framework of nonrelativistic-QCD factorization, we perform a comprehensive investigation of the color singlet (CS) contribution to prompt <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>J</a:mi><a:mo>/</a:mo><a:mi>ψ</a:mi></a:math> pair production at the CERN Large Hadron Collider at next-to-leading order (NLO) in <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>α</c:mi><c:mi>s</c:mi></c:msub></c:math>. Specifically, we compare our NLO predictions with measurements from the LHCb, CMS, and ATLAS collaborations. We find that the CS contribution itself can well describe the LHCb data in most of the experimental bins, except in the regions where the fixed-order calculation is spoiled by the emission of soft or hard-collinear gluons. In the CMS and ATLAS cases, however, the CS predictions greatly undershoot both the measured total and differential cross sections, despite sizable <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>K</e:mi></e:math> factors, of 2–3, for the total cross sections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.094040
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to double prompt <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> hadroproducti

Xiaobo Jin, Zhi-Guo He, Bernd A. Kniehl
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to double prompt <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> hadroproducti

Xiaobo Jin, Zhi-Guo He, Bernd A. Kniehl
article en

Abstract

Within the framework of nonrelativistic-QCD factorization, we perform a comprehensive investigation of the color singlet (CS) contribution to prompt <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>J</a:mi><a:mo>/</a:mo><a:mi>ψ</a:mi></a:math> pair production at the CERN Large Hadron Collider at next-to-leading order (NLO) in <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>α</c:mi><c:mi>s</c:mi></c:msub></c:math>. Specifically, we compare our NLO predictions with measurements from the LHCb, CMS, and ATLAS collaborations. We find that the CS contribution itself can well describe the LHCb data in most of the experimental bins, except in the regions where the fixed-order calculation is spoiled by the emission of soft or hard-collinear gluons. In the CMS and ATLAS cases, however, the CS predictions greatly undershoot both the measured total and differential cross sections, despite sizable <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>K</e:mi></e:math> factors, of 2–3, for the total cross sections.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(9)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Beijing Normal University (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Peking University, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.