Influence of floral orientation on feeding behavior in Anna's hummingbirds

Hover‐feeding by hummingbirds from pendent flowers relative to horizontal flowers increases the metabolic cost of flight, but in nature a large proportion of hummingbird‐pollinated flowers are nonetheless oriented near‐vertically downward. We used binary‐choice tests to assess behavioral preference of captive Anna's hummingbirds for these two particular floral orientations. The extent of nectar consumption from artificial flowers differed significantly over a 2‐hour exposure period, with birds showing greater extraction from the horizontal configuration. We also found that time spent hovering at the feeder immediately prior to nectar extraction did not vary by feeder orientation, whereas feeding duration tended to be greater at horizontal feeders. Opportunistic measurements of wild hummingbirds were also consistent with a preference for horizontal feeders. In aggregate, these observations suggest that the increased metabolic cost of hover‐feeding from pendent flowers is matched by an associated behavioral aversion, at least under the conditions examined here. However, pendent hummingbird‐specialized flowers are common, suggesting that additional behavioral or ecological factors underpin evolutionary persistence of this floral presentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Avian Biology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jav.03449
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of floral orientation on feeding behavior in Anna's hummingbirds

Julia Choi, Sierra Ru‐Yi Glassman, Robert Dudley
Journal of Avian Biology
Plant and animal studies
article

Influence of floral orientation on feeding behavior in Anna's hummingbirds

Julia Choi, Sierra Ru‐Yi Glassman, Robert Dudley
article en

Abstract

Hover‐feeding by hummingbirds from pendent flowers relative to horizontal flowers increases the metabolic cost of flight, but in nature a large proportion of hummingbird‐pollinated flowers are nonetheless oriented near‐vertically downward. We used binary‐choice tests to assess behavioral preference of captive Anna's hummingbirds for these two particular floral orientations. The extent of nectar consumption from artificial flowers differed significantly over a 2‐hour exposure period, with birds showing greater extraction from the horizontal configuration. We also found that time spent hovering at the feeder immediately prior to nectar extraction did not vary by feeder orientation, whereas feeding duration tended to be greater at horizontal feeders. Opportunistic measurements of wild hummingbirds were also consistent with a preference for horizontal feeders. In aggregate, these observations suggest that the increased metabolic cost of hover‐feeding from pendent flowers is matched by an associated behavioral aversion, at least under the conditions examined here. However, pendent hummingbird‐specialized flowers are common, suggesting that additional behavioral or ecological factors underpin evolutionary persistence of this floral presentation.

Journal of Avian BiologyVol. 2025(3)
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.