Effects of Uni- and Bi-Directional Interaction During Dyadic Ankle and Wrist Tracking

Haptic human-robot-human interaction allows users to feel and respond to one another's forces while interfacing with separate robotic devices, providing customizable infrastructure for studying physical interaction during motor tasks (e.g., physical rehabilitation). For upper- and lower-limb tracking tasks, previous work has shown that virtual interactions with a partner can improve motor performance depending on the skill level of each partner. However, whether the mechanism explaining these improvements is identical in the upper and lower limbs is an open question. In this work, we investigate the effects of haptic interaction between healthy individuals during a trajectory tracking task involving single-joint movements at the wrist and ankle. We compare tracking performance and muscle activation during haptic conditions where pairs of participants were uni- and bidirectionally connected to investigate the contribution of real-time responses from a partner during the interaction. Findings showed similar improvements in tracking performance during bidirectional interaction for both the wrist and ankle. This was observed despite distinct strategies in muscle co-contraction between joints, as co-contraction was dependent on partner ability for the wrist but not the ankle. For each joint, bidirectional and unidirectional interaction resulted in similar improvements for the worse partner in the dyad. For the better partner, bidirectional interaction resulted in greater improvements than unidirectional interaction. While these results suggest that unidirectional interaction is sufficient for error correction of less skilled individuals during simple motor tasks, they also highlight the mutual benefits of bidirectional interaction which are consistent across the upper and lower limbs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2025.3573956
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Uni- and Bi-Directional Interaction During Dyadic Ankle and Wrist Tracking

José L. Pons, Levi J. Hargrove, Etienne Burdet, Daniel Ludvig et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Foot and Ankle Surgery
3.44
article

Effects of Uni- and Bi-Directional Interaction During Dyadic Ankle and Wrist Tracking

José L. Pons, Levi J. Hargrove, Etienne Burdet, Daniel Ludvig, Matthew R. Short, Emek Barış Küçüktabak, Eric J. Perreault, Kevin Lynch, Francesco Di Tommaso, Lorenzo Vianello
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Haptic human-robot-human interaction allows users to feel and respond to one another's forces while interfacing with separate robotic devices, providing customizable infrastructure for studying physical interaction during motor tasks (e.g., physical rehabilitation). For upper- and lower-limb tracking tasks, previous work has shown that virtual interactions with a partner can improve motor performance depending on the skill level of each partner. However, whether the mechanism explaining these improvements is identical in the upper and lower limbs is an open question. In this work, we investigate the effects of haptic interaction between healthy individuals during a trajectory tracking task involving single-joint movements at the wrist and ankle. We compare tracking performance and muscle activation during haptic conditions where pairs of participants were uni- and bidirectionally connected to investigate the contribution of real-time responses from a partner during the interaction. Findings showed similar improvements in tracking performance during bidirectional interaction for both the wrist and ankle. This was observed despite distinct strategies in muscle co-contraction between joints, as co-contraction was dependent on partner ability for the wrist but not the ankle. For each joint, bidirectional and unidirectional interaction resulted in similar improvements for the worse partner in the dyad. For the better partner, bidirectional interaction resulted in greater improvements than unidirectional interaction. While these results suggest that unidirectional interaction is sufficient for error correction of less skilled individuals during simple motor tasks, they also highlight the mutual benefits of bidirectional interaction which are consistent across the upper and lower limbs.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringVol. 33
Northwestern University (US), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), Imperial College London (GB)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.