Swarm Imitation Learning From Observations

Learning from observation (LfO) is a process where an agent learns a task by passively observing a more competent agent perform it. LfO differs from classical Learning from demonstration (LfD) in that the former requires access to the demonstrator' s states only, whereas the latter requires both the demonstrator' s states and the corresponding actions. On the one hand, LfO avoids the sometimes costly or impractical burden of collecting the demonstrator' s actions, and instead only requires the demonstrator' s states which are more easily captured through cameras or sensors. On the other hand, LfO is more challenging than classical LfD because of the lack of detailed guidance from action labels. Despite the success of LfO in single-agent tasks, the literature falls short of assessing its feasibility in swarm systems, where multiple agents act simultaneously to enact a system-level state change. We tackle this research gap by proposing <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> that extends single-agent LfO by leveraging the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">centralised training with decentralised execution</i> framework to learn a useful agent-centric inverse dynamic model (AIDM). AIDM enables the imitator swarm to predict agent-level actions that would lead to swarm state transitions similar to those exhibited by the demonstrator swarm. Pairs of states and the corresponding estimated actions are then used for learning to imitate the demonstrated behaviour in a supervised learning manner. Evaluation experiments are conducted using four tasks that require different levels of coordination between swarm members: flocking, sheltering, dispersion, and herding. The results show that the performance of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> is comparable to classical LfD methods that require access to action information. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> is extensively evaluated and has demonstrated continued success under various experimental conditions including noise and different sizes of the demonstrator and imitator swarms. Our contribution will pave the way for imitation learning in swarms with diverse platforms, where the demonstrator and imitator swarms operate on different action spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tetci.2025.3569762
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swarm Imitation Learning From Observations

Hussein A. Abbass, Aya Hussein, Eleni Petraki
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Swarm Imitation Learning From Observations

Hussein A. Abbass, Aya Hussein, Eleni Petraki
article en

Abstract

Learning from observation (LfO) is a process where an agent learns a task by passively observing a more competent agent perform it. LfO differs from classical Learning from demonstration (LfD) in that the former requires access to the demonstrator' s states only, whereas the latter requires both the demonstrator' s states and the corresponding actions. On the one hand, LfO avoids the sometimes costly or impractical burden of collecting the demonstrator' s actions, and instead only requires the demonstrator' s states which are more easily captured through cameras or sensors. On the other hand, LfO is more challenging than classical LfD because of the lack of detailed guidance from action labels. Despite the success of LfO in single-agent tasks, the literature falls short of assessing its feasibility in swarm systems, where multiple agents act simultaneously to enact a system-level state change. We tackle this research gap by proposing <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> that extends single-agent LfO by leveraging the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">centralised training with decentralised execution</i> framework to learn a useful agent-centric inverse dynamic model (AIDM). AIDM enables the imitator swarm to predict agent-level actions that would lead to swarm state transitions similar to those exhibited by the demonstrator swarm. Pairs of states and the corresponding estimated actions are then used for learning to imitate the demonstrated behaviour in a supervised learning manner. Evaluation experiments are conducted using four tasks that require different levels of coordination between swarm members: flocking, sheltering, dispersion, and herding. The results show that the performance of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> is comparable to classical LfD methods that require access to action information. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Swarm-LfO</i> is extensively evaluated and has demonstrated continued success under various experimental conditions including noise and different sizes of the demonstrator and imitator swarms. Our contribution will pave the way for imitation learning in swarms with diverse platforms, where the demonstrator and imitator swarms operate on different action spaces.

IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational IntelligenceVol. 9(6)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.