The Contingency Effects of Five Sustainable Development Goals (Big Five <scp>SDGs</scp> ): A Cross‐National Study of Socially Responsible <scp>HRM</scp> and Well‐Being

ABSTRACT The emergence of the global sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the growing awareness of the economic, environmental, and social benefits of committing to sustainable development have led many organizations to consider how they can effectively contribute to this agenda. Drawing on institutional theory, this study seeks to advance this goal by examining in a multinational context how a socially responsible human resource management (SR‐HRM) approach might support employees' well‐being and whether a country's performance in achieving the five SDGs impacts this relationship. The results of multilevel analyses using data from 14,502 employees in 54 countries supported our hypotheses that SR‐HRM positively influences both dimensions of employees' well‐being (hedonic and eudaimonic). Furthermore, the moderating effects of national‐level SDG achievement suggest that levels of SDG achievement strengthened the association between SR‐HRM and employees' well‐being. Our findings support institutional theory by showing that organizations and their HRM systems are shaped by their broader institutional environment. In order to modify HRM systems, the findings support an outside‐in perspective in HRM and the role of formal instructions and regulations, such as the SDGs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3525
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Contingency Effects of Five Sustainable Development Goals (Big Five SDGs ): A Cross‐National Study of Socially Responsible HRM and Well‐Being

Fiona Edgar, Nataliya Podgorodnichenko, Paweł Jurek, Dariusz Turek et al.
2 citations
Sustainable Development
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
article

The Contingency Effects of Five Sustainable Development Goals (Big Five SDGs ): A Cross‐National Study of Socially Responsible HRM and Well‐Being

Fiona Edgar, Nataliya Podgorodnichenko, Paweł Jurek, Dariusz Turek, Howard J. Klein, Maria Järlström, Belgin Okay‐Somerville, Agnieszka Wojtczuk‐Turek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emergence of the global sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the growing awareness of the economic, environmental, and social benefits of committing to sustainable development have led many organizations to consider how they can effectively contribute to this agenda. Drawing on institutional theory, this study seeks to advance this goal by examining in a multinational context how a socially responsible human resource management (SR‐HRM) approach might support employees' well‐being and whether a country's performance in achieving the five SDGs impacts this relationship. The results of multilevel analyses using data from 14,502 employees in 54 countries supported our hypotheses that SR‐HRM positively influences both dimensions of employees' well‐being (hedonic and eudaimonic). Furthermore, the moderating effects of national‐level SDG achievement suggest that levels of SDG achievement strengthened the association between SR‐HRM and employees' well‐being. Our findings support institutional theory by showing that organizations and their HRM systems are shaped by their broader institutional environment. In order to modify HRM systems, the findings support an outside‐in perspective in HRM and the role of formal instructions and regulations, such as the SDGs.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(5)
SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL), Fisher College (US), University of Gdańsk (PL), Institute of Psychology (PL), The Ohio State University (US), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Vaasa (FI), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.