Auditor Response to Significant Disruption: Evidence from COVID-19 Lockdowns

SUMMARY Prior literature documents that auditors respond to changes in inherent and control risk. This study investigates how well auditors adapted their audit plans when unexpected disruption affected a different component of the audit risk model—namely auditors’ plans to achieve an appropriate level of detection risk. We use COVID-19 lockdowns in China as the setting because China’s lockdowns were the first of their kind, strictly enforced, and well aligned with the timing of year-end audits. We provide background information on auditors’ response to the pandemic based on interviews with auditors who conducted audits during the lockdowns. We then use a difference-in-differences (DiD) design and find that auditors who were subject to lockdowns were able to adapt their audit procedures, resulting in audit quality improvements. Additionally, we document several factors that facilitated auditors’ successful response, including auditor knowledge, audit effort, and client resources. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources noted in the article. JEL Classifications: L84; M41; M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-015
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditor Response to Significant Disruption: Evidence from COVID-19 Lockdowns

Zilong Song, Nathan J. Newton, Jiaxin Wang, Xi Xiong et al.
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditor Response to Significant Disruption: Evidence from COVID-19 Lockdowns

Zilong Song, Nathan J. Newton, Jiaxin Wang, Xi Xiong, Tianming Zhang
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Prior literature documents that auditors respond to changes in inherent and control risk. This study investigates how well auditors adapted their audit plans when unexpected disruption affected a different component of the audit risk model—namely auditors’ plans to achieve an appropriate level of detection risk. We use COVID-19 lockdowns in China as the setting because China’s lockdowns were the first of their kind, strictly enforced, and well aligned with the timing of year-end audits. We provide background information on auditors’ response to the pandemic based on interviews with auditors who conducted audits during the lockdowns. We then use a difference-in-differences (DiD) design and find that auditors who were subject to lockdowns were able to adapt their audit procedures, resulting in audit quality improvements. Additionally, we document several factors that facilitated auditors’ successful response, including auditor knowledge, audit effort, and client resources. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources noted in the article. JEL Classifications: L84; M41; M42.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & TheoryVol. 45(1)
Florida State University (US), Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN), Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Auditor Response to Significant Disruption: Evidence from COVID-19 Lockdowns — Zilong Song, Nathan J. Newton, et al. · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS