The Dignity Lens: Advancing Human‐Centred Protective and Proactive Algorithmic Responsibility

ABSTRACT Practically exercising responsibility when developing algorithms is a non‐trivial activity. The plethora of perspectives on responsible AI often leaves practitioners overwhelmed and confused about how to start and how to ensure efforts are embedded in ongoing practice, not just one‐off activities. Further, leaders who are concerned about the role of human‐centred values, like dignity, are often disappointed about a lack of guidance to practically make this prioritisation a reality in technology development. This paper presents a framework—the Dignity Lens—for reflecting on how technologies developed and/or implemented impact (human) relationships. The Dignity Lens is the outcome of multi‐year design science research undertaken in three organisational contexts. In this article, we describe the journey of the Dignity Lens from inception to now and an in‐depth application of the Dignity Lens in the most recent organisational context within which it was developed. We illustrate how this organisation has begun to embed the Dignity Lens into their everyday practices and the benefits of doing so. We argue that the Dignity Lens offers a unique way for practitioners to exercise protective and proactive responsibility and tangibly engage with concepts of dignity while building algorithms, offering space for constructive reflection, innovation and accountability in line with human‐centred commitments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Journal
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12601
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dignity Lens: Advancing Human‐Centred Protective and Proactive Algorithmic Responsibility

Lorenn P. Ruster, Katherine A. Daniell, Paola Oliva‐Altamirano
3 citations
Information Systems Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

The Dignity Lens: Advancing Human‐Centred Protective and Proactive Algorithmic Responsibility

Lorenn P. Ruster, Katherine A. Daniell, Paola Oliva‐Altamirano
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Practically exercising responsibility when developing algorithms is a non‐trivial activity. The plethora of perspectives on responsible AI often leaves practitioners overwhelmed and confused about how to start and how to ensure efforts are embedded in ongoing practice, not just one‐off activities. Further, leaders who are concerned about the role of human‐centred values, like dignity, are often disappointed about a lack of guidance to practically make this prioritisation a reality in technology development. This paper presents a framework—the Dignity Lens—for reflecting on how technologies developed and/or implemented impact (human) relationships. The Dignity Lens is the outcome of multi‐year design science research undertaken in three organisational contexts. In this article, we describe the journey of the Dignity Lens from inception to now and an in‐depth application of the Dignity Lens in the most recent organisational context within which it was developed. We illustrate how this organisation has begun to embed the Dignity Lens into their everyday practices and the benefits of doing so. We argue that the Dignity Lens offers a unique way for practitioners to exercise protective and proactive responsibility and tangibly engage with concepts of dignity while building algorithms, offering space for constructive reflection, innovation and accountability in line with human‐centred commitments.

Information Systems JournalVol. 36(1)
Australian National University (AU), Services Australia (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.