Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages

ABSTRACT Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta‐analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro‐industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high‐temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high‐resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision‐making to optimise fermentation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Grass and Forage Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12723
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages

Yaxk’in Coronado, Eneas Aguirre‐von‐Wobeser, Mayra de la Torre, Fred Eduardo Hernández‐Perea
1 citations
Grass and Forage Science
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
1.72
article

Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages

Yaxk’in Coronado, Eneas Aguirre‐von‐Wobeser, Mayra de la Torre, Fred Eduardo Hernández‐Perea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta‐analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro‐industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high‐temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high‐resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision‐making to optimise fermentation outcomes.

Grass and Forage ScienceVol. 80(2)
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (MX), Universidad La Salle (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages — Yaxk’in Coronado, Eneas Aguirre‐von‐Wobeser, et al. · Grass and Forage Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS