Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm

Aphantasia is defined as the reduced capacity to form mental images voluntarily. Previous research provided mixed evidence regarding the effect this individual variation may have on other areas of cognition and different aspects of memory. This study investigated how a reduction in mental imagery affects verbal memory with a specific focus on false memory generation by comparing the performance of aphantasic and non-aphantasic control participants in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Correlational analyses revealed that higher visual imagery ability was weakly associated with better free recall performance but also more extra-list recall intrusions. However, contrary to expectations, the experimental findings demonstrated no differential effect of aphantasia on veridical or false memory in either free recall or recognition suggesting that aphantasia does not protect against verbal false memory generation. Future work should consider the effect of aphantasia on false memory generation using visual variants of the DRM task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103888
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm

Kata Pauly‐Takacs, Gaby Pfeifer, Natasha Sigala, Saeed Younus
1 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Memory Processes and Influences
1.43
article

Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm

Kata Pauly‐Takacs, Gaby Pfeifer, Natasha Sigala, Saeed Younus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aphantasia is defined as the reduced capacity to form mental images voluntarily. Previous research provided mixed evidence regarding the effect this individual variation may have on other areas of cognition and different aspects of memory. This study investigated how a reduction in mental imagery affects verbal memory with a specific focus on false memory generation by comparing the performance of aphantasic and non-aphantasic control participants in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Correlational analyses revealed that higher visual imagery ability was weakly associated with better free recall performance but also more extra-list recall intrusions. However, contrary to expectations, the experimental findings demonstrated no differential effect of aphantasia on veridical or false memory in either free recall or recognition suggesting that aphantasia does not protect against verbal false memory generation. Future work should consider the effect of aphantasia on false memory generation using visual variants of the DRM task.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 133
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Memory Processes and Influences
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm — Kata Pauly‐Takacs, Gaby Pfeifer, et al. · Consciousness and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS