Geopolitical Tension and ASEAN: How to Keep the World Economy Vigorous?

Abstract This policy paper argues the importance of economic assessment on geopolitical tension-related policies and reviews the economic effects of two major policies related to global supply chains (GSCs), tariff war 1.0 and high-tech export control, particularly from the viewpoint of the third countries in a three-country model including ASEAN member states (AMS). It finds that some of the AMS aggressively utilized the wave of supply chain reshuffling and gained positive trade diversion effects. Although it is difficult to predict what policies the second Trump administration would introduce, the dominant strategy for AMS is to take advantage of positive effects to upgrade their position in GSCs. With heightening national security concerns, it may be inevitable to make some parts of the economy restricted. However, the rest of the economy must keep its vigor with GSCs. Middle powers should work with newly developed and developing countries such as AMS through various channels to retain the rules-based trading regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Economic Papers
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00940
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical Tension and ASEAN: How to Keep the World Economy Vigorous?

Fukunari Kimura
1 citations
Asian Economic Papers
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Geopolitical Tension and ASEAN: How to Keep the World Economy Vigorous?

Fukunari Kimura
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This policy paper argues the importance of economic assessment on geopolitical tension-related policies and reviews the economic effects of two major policies related to global supply chains (GSCs), tariff war 1.0 and high-tech export control, particularly from the viewpoint of the third countries in a three-country model including ASEAN member states (AMS). It finds that some of the AMS aggressively utilized the wave of supply chain reshuffling and gained positive trade diversion effects. Although it is difficult to predict what policies the second Trump administration would introduce, the dominant strategy for AMS is to take advantage of positive effects to upgrade their position in GSCs. With heightening national security concerns, it may be inevitable to make some parts of the economy restricted. However, the rest of the economy must keep its vigor with GSCs. Middle powers should work with newly developed and developing countries such as AMS through various channels to retain the rules-based trading regime.

Asian Economic PapersVol. 24(2)
Keio University (JP), Japan External Trade Organization (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geopolitical Tension and ASEAN: How to Keep the World Economy Vigorous? — Fukunari Kimura · Asian Economic Papers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS