NCAA Student-Athletes' Sports Gambling Behaviors Examined Using Psychological Reactance Theory

Since the repeal of the Pro and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in 2018, sports gambling has been a rapidly growing segment of the sport world. The United States federal government has left it up to individual states to legalize and govern the activity of sports gambling, however, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) still prohibits (Bylaw 10.3) the activity regardless of legality. With it known that student-athletes violate Bylaw 10.3 (e.g., Paskus & Derevensky, 2025; Richard et al., 2019), this study examined sports gambling behaviors through under the scope of Psychological Reactance Theory (PRT) to investigate if student-athletes’ sports gambling engagement could be explained. The findings of this study revealed NCAA student-athletes’ understanding of Bylaw 10.3, their determined value on athletic eligibility, and everything related to their sports gambling behavior (e.g., amount of money wagered, frequency, moral restrictions) while disclosing bylaw violating actions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of issues in intercollegiate athletics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51221/sc.jiia.2025.18.1.8
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NCAA Student-Athletes' Sports Gambling Behaviors Examined Using Psychological Reactance Theory

Braden Norris, Paul M. Pedersen
Journal of issues in intercollegiate athletics
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
article

NCAA Student-Athletes' Sports Gambling Behaviors Examined Using Psychological Reactance Theory

Braden Norris, Paul M. Pedersen
article en

Abstract

Since the repeal of the Pro and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in 2018, sports gambling has been a rapidly growing segment of the sport world. The United States federal government has left it up to individual states to legalize and govern the activity of sports gambling, however, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) still prohibits (Bylaw 10.3) the activity regardless of legality. With it known that student-athletes violate Bylaw 10.3 (e.g., Paskus & Derevensky, 2025; Richard et al., 2019), this study examined sports gambling behaviors through under the scope of Psychological Reactance Theory (PRT) to investigate if student-athletes’ sports gambling engagement could be explained. The findings of this study revealed NCAA student-athletes’ understanding of Bylaw 10.3, their determined value on athletic eligibility, and everything related to their sports gambling behavior (e.g., amount of money wagered, frequency, moral restrictions) while disclosing bylaw violating actions.

Journal of issues in intercollegiate athleticsVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.